Fanor v. Alvarado, 091310 FED3, 08-2907
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM|
|Party Name:||EVANS FANOR, Appellant v. OFFICER CARLOS ALVARADO, individually and in his capacity as an officer with the Newark Police Department; NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF NEWARK|
|Judge Panel:||Before: RENDELL, HARDIMAN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||September 13, 2010|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit|
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1 August 13, 2010.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.N.J. Civil No. 05-cv-05536) District Judge: Honorable Peter G. Sheridan.
Evans Fanor, proceeding pro se, appeals a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in favor of Officer Carlos Alvarado, the City of Newark, New Jersey, and the Newark Police Department in his civil rights action. We will affirm.
Fanor was employed as a patient advocate in a hospital emergency room. In March 2004, a nurse asked Officer Alvarado, who brought prisoner-patients to the hospital, to move away while she treated a patient. Officer Alvarado would not do so and his superior was contacted. According to Fanor, Officer Alvarado became belligerent. Fanor claimed that, after this incident, Officer Alvarado belittled him when he brought prisoners to the hospital. Officer Alvarado denies harassing Fanor.
On May 8, 2004, Fanor told Officer Alvarado, who was talking on his cell phone, to get off of his phone because Fanor believed that cell phones were prohibited in the area where Officer Alvarado was talking. The parties dispute what happened next. Fanor alleged that Officer Alvarado poked him, grabbed him and pinched his skin, and twisted his arm in order to handcuff him. Officer Alvarado stated that Fanor approached him in a hostile, threatening manner and would not stop yelling after he warned Fanor to stop. Officer Alvarado arrested Fanor on charges of terroristic threats, obstruction of administration of the law, resisting arrest, and disorderly conduct. The disorderly conduct charge was dismissed in municipal court. Fanor was not indicted on the other charges.
Fanor filed a pro se complaint against Officer Alvarado pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, raising claims of false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and use of excessive force. He also claimed that the City of Newark and the Newark Police Department had a policy or custom of supporting any action taken by its officers, that the City and Police Department had knowledge of prior similar incidents involving Officer Alvarado, and that the City and Police Department failed to train, discipline...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP