Favors v. Hoover, 110816 FED8, 16-1888

Docket Nº:16-1888
Opinion Judge:PER CURIAM.
Party Name:Joseph Anthony Favors Plaintiff- Appellant v. Michelle Hoover; Emily Johnson Piper; Daniel Storkamp; Dennis Benson; Jeanine Herbert; Lori Swanson; Ralph Schmidt; Mandy Torgerson; Rob Rose; Dianna Magaard; Deb James; Juli Rose; Beth Virden; Joann Fabian; Jeffrey L. Peterson; Deborah J. Schadegg; Christopher Boreland; Mark Mehl; John King; Ann ...
Judge Panel:Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:November 08, 2016
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Joseph Anthony Favors Plaintiff- Appellant

v.

Michelle Hoover; Emily Johnson Piper; Daniel Storkamp; Dennis Benson; Jeanine Herbert; Lori Swanson; Ralph Schmidt; Mandy Torgerson; Rob Rose; Dianna Magaard; Deb James; Juli Rose; Beth Virden; Joann Fabian; Jeffrey L. Peterson; Deborah J. Schadegg; Christopher Boreland; Mark Mehl; John King; Ann Linkert (Zimmerman); Jean Seykora; Thomas Lundquist; Chad Mesojedec; Todd White; (O.D.) Guillickson; Terry Kniesel; Jamie Kozisch; Tracy Gebhart; Craig Berg; Steve Youngst; Jon Hibber; Kevin Schlerer; Jena Jones; Rick O'Conner; Eyvette Anderson; Office of Health Facility Complaints; DHS Office of Maltreatment Complaints; Office of Licensing for the Security Hospital; The State of Minnesota; Rebecca Ranem Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-1888

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

November 8, 2016

         Unpublished

          Submitted: November 4, 2016

         Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

          Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

          PER CURIAM.

         Joseph Anthony Favors appeals, following the entry of final judgment, a district court1 order granting certain defendants' motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 848-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we find no error in the district court's analysis of Mr. Favors's claims. We grant the motion to supplement the ...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP