Henderson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., 112316 FED9, 15-55298
|Party Name:||ROBERT HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.|
|Judge Panel:||Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||November 23, 2016|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted November 16, 2016 [*]
Appeal from the United States District Court D.C. No. 2:14-cv-05960-DDP-PJW for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding
Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Robert Henderson appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his action alleging fraud and theft in connection with his veteran's benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's dismissal of an action for failure to comply with a court order. Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.3d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Henderson's action because Henderson failed to comply with court-ordered discovery even after the district court warned him that noncompliance could result in dismissal, and granted him three months to show good cause for his noncompliance. See id. (setting forth the five factors the district court must consider before dismissing an action for...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP