Henderson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., 112316 FED9, 15-55298

Docket Nº:15-55298
Party Name:ROBERT HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judge Panel:Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:November 23, 2016
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

ROBERT HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-55298

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

November 23, 2016

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted November 16, 2016 [*]

Appeal from the United States District Court D.C. No. 2:14-cv-05960-DDP-PJW for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM [**]

Robert Henderson appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his action alleging fraud and theft in connection with his veteran's benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's dismissal of an action for failure to comply with a court order. Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.3d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Henderson's action because Henderson failed to comply with court-ordered discovery even after the district court warned him that noncompliance could result in dismissal, and granted him three months to show good cause for his noncompliance. See id. (setting forth the five factors the district court must consider before dismissing an action for...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP