Moore v. City of Butte, 111413 FED9, 11-18024

Docket Nº:11-18024
Party Name:LESLIE MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE; CITY OF CHICO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; BUTTE COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES; CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT; BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; TERRY MOORE; ROBERT MERRIFIELD; LORETTA MACPHAIL; BRUCE HAGERTY; JOHN RUCKER; MICHAEL O'BRIEN; MICHAEL
Judge Panel:Before: W. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, District Judge.
Case Date:November 14, 2013
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

LESLIE MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF BUTTE; CITY OF CHICO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; BUTTE COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES; CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT; BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; TERRY MOORE; ROBERT MERRIFIELD; LORETTA MACPHAIL; BRUCE HAGERTY; JOHN RUCKER; MICHAEL O'BRIEN; MICHAEL MALONEY; MICHAEL WEBBER; DANIEL FONSECA; LINDA DYE; JOHN CARILLO; JOSE LARA; ALICIA ROCK; LORI BARKER; ROGER WILSON; RICK WEST; KORY HONEA; MICHAEL RAMSEY; PAMELA CHAMBERS; JORGE LOZANO; ERIN SWEET; ERIC O'BERG; DAVID KENNEDY; PETER MEADOWSONG; KIMBERLY MERRIFIELD; BRUCE ALPERT; AMY KING; TAMARA SOLANO; STEVEN MCNELIS; WILLIAM PATRICK; TAMARA MOSBARGER; JAMES REILLEY; DAVID GUNN; WILLIAM LAMB, Administrative Law Judge; ANNE OSBORN; ELISABETH WOODWARD; MARTIN MCHUGH; ALFRED DRISCOLL; GARY WILSON; RICHARD THOMAS; LARRY LEVINE; WINDSOR; LANG; NORTH STATE PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEE RETIREE MEDICAL TRUST; PAMELA RICHARDS; PATRICIA PARRA, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-18024

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

November 14, 2013

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted November 6, 2013 [**] San Francisco, California

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00713-KJM-CMK

Before: W. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, District Judge. [***]

MEMORANDUM [*]

Pro se petitioner Leslie Moore appeals the dismissal of her complaint, which alleged misconduct by various government entities and employees relating to her divorce and child custody battle. We assume the parties' familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. Because Ms. Moore's complaint does not state a cognizable claim against any of the defendants, we affirm.

We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo. Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012). "When ruling on a motion to dismiss, we accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005). "To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP