Moore v. City of Butte, 111413 FED9, 11-18024
|Party Name:||LESLIE MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE; CITY OF CHICO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; BUTTE COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES; CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT; BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; TERRY MOORE; ROBERT MERRIFIELD; LORETTA MACPHAIL; BRUCE HAGERTY; JOHN RUCKER; MICHAEL O'BRIEN; MICHAEL|
|Judge Panel:||Before: W. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, District Judge.|
|Case Date:||November 14, 2013|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted November 6, 2013 [**] San Francisco, California
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00713-KJM-CMK
Pro se petitioner Leslie Moore appeals the dismissal of her complaint, which alleged misconduct by various government entities and employees relating to her divorce and child custody battle. We assume the parties' familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. Because Ms. Moore's complaint does not state a cognizable claim against any of the defendants, we affirm.
We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo. Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012). "When ruling on a motion to dismiss, we accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005). "To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP