United States v. Ramos-Sanchez, 100114 FED9, 14-50026
|Party Name:||UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CARLOS RAMOS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.|
|Judge Panel:||Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||October 01, 2014|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted September 23, 2014 [**]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California No. 3:09-cr-02986-GT Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Carlos Ramos-Sanchez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 14-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ramos-Sanchez first contends that the district court erred by failing to (i) independently calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, (ii) consider the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, other than deterrence, and (iii) explain adequately the sentence imposed. We disagree. The record reflects that the district court adopted the correctly-calculated Guidelines range provided by the probation officer, adequately considered the applicable section 3553(a) sentencing factors, and sufficiently explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
Ramos-Sanchez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ramos-Sanchez's sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP