United States v. Ramos-Sanchez, 100114 FED9, 14-50026

Docket Nº:14-50026
Party Name:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CARLOS RAMOS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judge Panel:Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:October 01, 2014
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARLOS RAMOS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-50026

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

October 1, 2014

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted September 23, 2014 [**]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California No. 3:09-cr-02986-GT Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM [*]

Carlos Ramos-Sanchez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 14-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramos-Sanchez first contends that the district court erred by failing to (i) independently calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, (ii) consider the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, other than deterrence, and (iii) explain adequately the sentence imposed. We disagree. The record reflects that the district court adopted the correctly-calculated Guidelines range provided by the probation officer, adequately considered the applicable section 3553(a) sentencing factors, and sufficiently explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Ramos-Sanchez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ramos-Sanchez's sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP