Vylasek v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., 081716 FED8, 16-1193
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM.|
|Party Name:||Patricia Vylasek; John J. Vylasek Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc.; Aurora Loan Services, LLC; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC; Residential Funding Company, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; Does I-X Defendants-Appellees|
|Judge Panel:||Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||August 17, 2016|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|
Submitted: August 12, 2016
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
John and Patricia Vylasek appeal after the district court1 dismissed their complaint with prejudice. They also move for this court to take judicial notice of certain facts.
After careful de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Anderson-Tully Co. v. McDaniel, 571 F.3d 760, 762 (8th Cir. 2009) (grant of motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity jurisdiction); Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann, 808 N.W.2d 828, 833 (Minn. 2011) (elements of breach-of-contract claim); Paidar v. Hughes, 615 N.W.2d 276, 279-80 (Minn. 2000) (elements of slander-of-title claim).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP