Willingham v. Crutchfield, 060513 FED4, 13-6161
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM:|
|Party Name:||CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. G. CRUTCHFIELD, Asst. Supt Programs Staff; LYNN SUMMERS, Supt of Hoke CI 4320; K. STAND BACK, Asst of Hoke CI 4320; ROBERT C. LEWIS, Dir O.P.S. of N. Carolina; MEDICAL DEPT.; MAILROOM STAFF, Defendants-Appellees.|
|Attorney:||Charles D. Willingham, Appellant Pro Se.|
|Judge Panel:||Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||June 05, 2013|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|
Submitted: May 30, 2013
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:12-cv-00324-RJC)
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles D. Willingham seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on November 21, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP