__ Cal.5th __, S173359, People v. Coon

Docket NºS173359
Citation__ Cal.5th __, 224 P.3d 919, 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181
Party NamePEOPLE v. COON (James Dale).
Judge PanelGEORGE, C.J. CHIN, A.C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.
Case DateFebruary 03, 2010
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (California)

Page __

__ Cal.4th __

224 P.3d 919, 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181

PEOPLE

v.

COON (James Dale).

No. S173359

Supreme Court of California

February 3, 2010

Prior report: __ Cal.App. __, 92 Cal.Rptr.3d 555.

OPINION

The unopposed motion for dismissal of review in this matter is granted.

[224 P.3d 920] GEORGE, C.J., was absent and did not participate.

CHIN, A.C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
58 practice notes
  • 246 Cal.App.4th 896, A134423, Campaign for Quality Education v. State
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • April 20, 2016
    ...inquiry. (Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42 [105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920] (Committee for Green Foothills); Pang v. Beverly Hospital, Inc. (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 986, 989 [94 Cal.Rptr.2d 643].) Our re......
  • 20 Cal.App.5th 989, B270487, Redfearn v. Trader Joe’s Company
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 2018
    ...P.3d 50; Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42, 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920.) We assume the truth of the properly pleaded factual allegations, facts that reasonably can be inferred from those expressly ......
  • 221 Cal.App.4th 49, G046799, Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • October 31, 2013
    ...as true. Page 56 (Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42 [105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920].) We also accept as true facts appearing in exhibits attached to the complaint. (Sarale v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (2010) 189 Cal.App.......
  • 222 Cal.App.4th 303, G047121, Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. Berger Kahn
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • December 18, 2013
    ...[Citation.]" ( Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42, 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920; Baright v. Willis, supra, 151 Cal.App.3d at p. 311, 198 Cal.Rptr. 510.) (6) Actual fraud— Finally, as we recall, the Code of Civil Procedur......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • 26 Cal.App.5th 561, B283480, Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • August 23, 2018
    ...” (Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 55 [105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920].) 2. It is undisputed that the City prepared an environmental impact report regarding the Superstore. Because the activity at ......
  • 55 Cal.App.5th 665, A157662, Dones v. Life Ins. Co. of North America
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 2020
    ...( Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42 [105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920].) "If the court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend, as here, we Page 677 decide whether there is a reasonable possibility......
  • 30 Cal.App.5th 1105, B282971, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 848 v. City of Monterey Park
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 2019
    ..." (Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42, 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920; see SJJC Aviation Services, LLC v. City of San Jose (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1043, 1051, 219 Cal.Rptr.3d 637 ["[w]e review t......
  • 25 Cal.App.5th 666, B283846, California Water Impact Network v. County of San Luis Obispo
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • June 28, 2018
    ...de novo. (Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 42 [105 Cal.Rptr.3d 181, 224 P.3d 920].) We examine the petition and the governing ordinance to determine whether County had a duty to conduct a CEQA review, or whether......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT