Berk v. United States
| Citation | 132 S.Ct. 1650 (Mem),182 L.Ed.2d 245,565 U.S. 1241 |
| Decision Date | 27 February 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. 11–8564.,11–8564. |
| Parties | Michael A. BERK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
565 U.S. 1241
132 S.Ct. 1650 (Mem)
182 L.Ed.2d 245
Michael A. BERK, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 11–8564.
Supreme Court of the United States
Feb. 27, 2012.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Hightower v. City of Bos.
......No. 11–2281. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 6, 2012. Decided Aug. 30, 2012. . ... See United States v. Berk, 652 F.3d 132, 137 n. 5 (1st Cir.2011) (issues not developed in the opening brief are waived), ......
-
Demink v. United States
......While the Sixth Circuit has yet to squarely decide this issue, seven circuits have concluded that a defendant can violate § 2422(b) by communicating through an adult intermediary, without having any direct contact with the minor child. See United States v . Berk , 652 F.3d 132, 140 (1st Cir.2011), cert . denied , ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 1650 (2012); United States v . Douglas , 626 F.3d 161, 164-65 (2d Cir.2010), cert . denied , ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1024 (2011); United States v . Nestor , 574 F.3d 159, 162 (3d Cir.2009); United States v . ......
-
State v. Cosmo
...... do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.In United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir.2004), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed ...Berk, 652 F.3d 132, 140 (1st Cir.2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 1650, 182 ......
-
United States v. Caudill
......Olvera, 687 F.3d 645, 647 (5th Cir.2012) (per curiam). 3.United States v. Barlow, 568 F.3d 215, 219 n. 10 (5th Cir.2009). 4.687 F.3d 645 (5th Cir.2012) (per curiam). 5.Id. at 647–48. 6.Id. at 648. 7.United States v. Berk, 652 F.3d 132, 140 (1st Cir.2011), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 1650, 182 L.Ed.2d 245 (2012); United States v. Douglas, 626 F.3d 161, 164–65 (2d Cir.2010) (per curiam); United States v. Nestor, 574 F.3d 159, 162 (3d Cir.2009); United States v. Spurlock, 495 F.3d 1011, 1014 ......
Request a trial to view additional results