AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source, LLC v. State
Decision Date | 02 August 2018 |
Docket Number | SC S065394 |
Citation | 363 Or. 411,423 P.3d 71 |
Parties | AAA OREGON/IDAHO AUTO SOURCE, LLC; AAA Oregon/Idaho; and Oregon Trucking Associations, Inc., Petitioners, v. STATE of Oregon, BY AND THROUGH the DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Gregory A. Chaimov, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed petition for review and the reply brief for petitioners.
Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.
Alan S. Dale, Senior Deputy Legislative Counsel, Salem, filed the brief for amicus curiae Oregon Legislative Assembly.
In 2017, the legislature enacted a law that provides, in part, "A tax is imposed on each vehicle dealer for the privilege of engaging in the business of selling taxable motor vehicles at retail in this state." Or. Laws 2017, ch. 750, § 90(1). The issue in this case is whether that tax is subject to Article IX, section 3a, of the Oregon Constitution. As relevant here, Article IX, section 3a, provides that taxes "on the ownership, operation or use of motor vehicles" "shall be used exclusively for the construction, reconstruction, improvement, repair, maintenance, operation and use of public highways, roads, streets and roadside rest areas in this state." For the reasons explained below, we conclude the tax is not subject to Article IX, section 3a.
This case is before this court because, in the same law that established the tax at issue, the legislature conferred original jurisdiction upon this court to determine whether the tax is subject to Article IX, section 3a. Or. Laws 2017, ch. 750, § 112(3)(a). The law also authorized "[a]ny person interested in or affected or aggrieved by" the tax to petition this court to make that determination. Or. Laws 2017, ch. 750, § 112(2). Pursuant to that authority, petitioners—AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source, LLC (Auto Source), AAA Oregon/Idaho, and Oregon Trucking Associations, Inc.—filed the petition for judicial review in this case. The state appears as respondent, and the Oregon Legislative Assembly appears as amicus curiae .
Petitioners assert that they have standing for several reasons, including that Auto Source is a vehicle dealer who is subject to the tax. Respondent agrees that Auto Source is affected by the tax. Therefore, it is undisputed that Auto Source has standing. Accordingly, we proceed to our review of the tax. See MacPherson v. DAS , 340 Or. 117, 123-24, 130 P.3d 308 (2006) ( ).
We begin with a description of the tax at issue, before turning to an examination of Article IX, section 3a, and then addressing whether the tax is subject to Article IX, section 3a.
The tax at issue was imposed by the legislature through Oregon Laws 2017, chapter 750, section 90, and we refer to it as the "Section 90" tax. By its terms, the Section 90 tax is a "privilege tax," and it is imposed on vehicle dealers "for the privilege of engaging in the business of selling taxable motor vehicles at retail in this state."1 Id. § 90(1). It is "computed at the rate of 0.5 percent of the retail sales price of the taxable motor vehicle." Id. § 90(2). It is to be paid by vehicle dealers by means of quarterly tax returns filed with the Department of Revenue. Id. § 98(2), (4). "A vehicle dealer may collect the amount of the privilege tax computed on the retail sales price of a taxable motor vehicle from the purchaser of the taxable motor vehicle." Id. § 90(3)(a).
As noted, the Section 90 tax is imposed on "vehicle dealers" and is based on retail sales of "taxable motor vehicles." A "vehicle dealer" is "[a] person engaged in business in this state that has been issued a vehicle dealer certificate under ORS 822.020." Or. Laws 2017, ch. 750, § 89(9)(a). A "taxable motor vehicle" is "a new motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,000 pounds or less" that is also, inter alia , a "vehicle as defined in ORS 744.850, other than an all-terrain vehicle" or a "commercial vehicle as defined in ORS 801.210."2 Id. § 89(6). Thus, the Section 90 tax is imposed only on vehicle dealers, and, it is calculated based only on certain sales. It is not triggered by all motor vehicle sales; specifically, it is not triggered by sales by persons who are not vehicle dealers, by sales to resellers, or by sales of used vehicles.
The legislature did not view the Section 90 tax as a tax on the "ownership, operation or use of motor vehicles" for the purposes of Article IX, section 3a. Or. Laws 2017, ch. 750, § 112(1) (). In keeping with that view, the legislature provided that moneys received from the Section 90 tax shall be deposited into the Zero-Emission Incentive Fund and the Connect Oregon Fund, rather than the State Highway Fund (or other fund dedicated to the uses listed in Article IX, section 3a ).3
In addition to the Section 90 tax, which it refers to as a "privilege tax," Oregon Laws 2017, chapter 750, also establishes what it refers to as a "use tax." Specifically, section 91 of the law imposes a tax "on the storage, use or other consumption in this state of taxable motor vehicles purchased at retail from any seller," and we refer to that tax as the "Section 91" tax. Id. § 91(1). The rate of the Section 91 use tax is the same as the rate of the Section 90 privilege tax: "0.5 percent of the retail sales price of the taxable motor vehicle." Id. § 91(2). The Section 91 use tax is a liability of the purchaser, but it is reduced by the amount of other taxes imposed upon the sale, including any privilege tax. Id. § 91(3), (4). Thus, if a dealer pays the Section 90 privilege tax (either on its own or after collecting the tax from the purchaser), the purchaser will not have to pay the Section 91 use tax. Because the amounts of the two taxes are the same, payment of the Section 90 privilege tax reduces the Section 91 use tax to zero.4 The legislature provided that moneys from the Section 91 use tax shall be deposited into the State Highway Fund. Id. § 96(2)(b).
As mentioned, the legislature conferred original jurisdiction upon this court to determine whether the Section 90 privilege tax is subject to Article IX, section 3a. Or. Laws 2017, ch. 750, § 112(2). It also provided that, if this court determines that the Section 90 privilege tax is subject to Article IX, section 3a, then both Section 90 and Section 91 are repealed. Id. § 112(8).
Having described the Section 90 tax, we turn to Article IX, section 3a, to determine its scope and whether the Section 90 tax falls within it. Article IX, section 3a, restricts the uses of certain taxes. In pertinent part, it provides:
Thus, Article IX, section 3a, restricts the use of two categories of taxes: certain "motor vehicle fuel" taxes, which are the subject of paragraph (1)(a), and certain "motor vehicle" taxes, which are the subject of paragraph (1)(b).
Article IX, section 3a, was adopted by the voters in 1980, based on a legislative referral. 79 Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 7 (1979) (adopted May 20, 1980). But the relevant text of the provision, quoted above, has been in the Oregon Constitution since 1942, when it was adopted as part of former Article IX, section 3, which was also the result of a legislative referral to the voters. 41 SJR 11 (1941) (adopted Nov. 3, 1942). The descriptions of the categories have remained the same since 1942.5
The 1942 provision was repealed and replaced by the 1980 provision to further limit the permissible uses of the two categories of taxes. The only substantive difference between the two provisions is that the 1942 provision allowed for use of the taxes to support "policing" of public highways, roads, and streets, as well as acquiring and maintaining "parks, recreational, scenic or other historic places," and the 1980 provision deleted those uses. 79 SJR 7 (1979); Official Voters' Pamphlet, Primary Election, May 20, 1980, 4.6
Because the relevant text of Article IX, section 3a, was adopted in 1942 and has remained the same since then, when interpreting the phrase at issue, our task is to determine the intent of the voters in 1942. See generally Parrish v. Rosenblum , 362 Or. 96, 111, 403 P.3d 786 (2017) ( ); State ex rel Caleb v. Beesley , 326 Or. 83, 88, 949 P.2d 724 (1997) ( ).
We interpret a referred constitutional amendment "within the same basic framework as we interpret statutes: by looking to the text, context, and legislative history of the amendment to determine the intent of the voters." State v. Sagdal , 356 Or. 639, 642, 343 P.3d 226 (2015) ; Couey v. Atkins , 357 Or. 460, 490-91, 355 P.3d 866 (2015) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Haji
...the enactment of that prior version in our effort to determine the meaning of the amended provision. AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source v. Dept. of Rev. , 363 Or. 411, 417-18, 423 P.3d 71 (2018). As we later discuss, defendant places significant weight on what voters intended in 1908 when they fi......
-
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue
...for bus or trucking companies). The Oregon Supreme Court has rejected that logic. See AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source v. Dept. of Rev., 363 Or. 411, 421, 423 P.3d 71 (2018) ("[A]s used in Article IX, section 3a, taxes 'on' the ownership of a motor vehicle are limited to those based on the fact......
-
Linn Cnty. v. Brown
...interpretation, "courts are not to insert what has been omitted, or to omit what has been inserted." AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source v. Dept. of Rev. , 363 Or. 411, 418, 423 P.3d 71 (2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). Moreover, plaintiff continues, "program" is defined to mean, in part,......
-
Or. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp.
...that Article IX, section 3a, was intended "to stop the raid" on the highway fund for nonhighway uses); AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source v. Dept. of Rev. , 363 Or. 411, 417, 423 P.3d 71 (2018) (explaining that Article IX, section 3a, was amended in 1980 to remove the ability to use the highway f......
-
Chapter § 1.4
...at the time of original adoption or at the time of the amendment? In AAA Oregon / Idaho Auto Source, L.L.C. v. State, 363 Or 411, 417-18, 423 P3d 71 (2018), the court explained that, if the original phrasing is unchanged, then the proper focus remains its meaning at the time of its original......
-
Chapter § 14.4
...actions that an owner might take, such as selling or buying" vehicles. AAA Oregon / Idaho Auto Source, L.L.C. v. State, 363 Or 411, 421, 423 P3d 71 (2018). Furthermore, the legislative history to Article IX, section 3a, indicates that the provision applies to "special highway user taxes" bu......