Abascal v. Fleckenstein
| Docket Number | 14-1591 |
| Decision Date | 29 April 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
-
Coty Inc. v. Excell Brands, LLC
... ... 14; Pfau Direct ¶ 4)—provided no detail as to what the columns were or how the figures within the columns were calculated. See, e.g. , Abascal v. Fleckenstein , 820 F.3d 561, 566 (2d Cir. 2016) (finding that a report lacked trustworthiness in part because it "does not describe the ... ...
-
U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Itg Dev. Grp., LLC
... ... Courts, however, distinguish between statements in the report made by those with a "business duty" to report and those who do not. See Abascal v. Fleckenstein , 820 F.3d 561, 566 (2d Cir. 2016) ("A duty to report, furthermore, ‘has long been recognized as the principal means of ... ...
-
Woods v. Start Treatment & Recovery Ctrs., Inc.
... ... We review for abuse of discretion the district court's admission into evidence of a witness's invocation of the Fifth Amendment, Abascal v. Fleckenstein , 820 F.3d 561, 564 (2d Cir. 2016), and we review de novo the related jury instructions, United States v. Ford , 435 F.3d 204, ... ...
-
Callahan v. Wilson
... ... 2012). A district court abuses its discretion if it makes "an error of law or a clear error of fact." Abascal v. Fleckenstein , 820 F.3d 561, 564 (2d Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). Upon review of the trial record, we identify no such error in ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Part two: case summaries by major topics.
...TO COURTS U.S. Appeals Court EVIDENCE DAMAGES Abascal v. Fleckenstein, 820 F.3d 561 (2d Cir. 2016). A state prisoner brought a pro se [section] 1983 action against corrections officers, alleging that he was deprived of meals and was physically assaulted in violation of his Eighth Amendment ......
-
Part one: complete case summaries in alphabetical order.
...Food, Safety FAILURE TO PROTECT: Officer on Prisoner Assault LIABILITY: Punitive Damages USE OF FORCE: Excessive Force Abascal v. Fleckenstein, 820 F.3d 561 (2d Cir. 2016). A state prisoner brought a pro se [section] 1983 action against corrections officers, alleging that he was deprived of......
