Abbott v. Administrative Hearing Bd., Prince George's County, No. 1146

• Court: Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
• Writing for the Court: ELDRIDGE
• Citation: 366 A.2d 756,33 Md.App. 681
• Decision Date: 30 November 1976
• Docket Number: No. 1146
• Parties: Douglas L. ABBOTT v. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING BOARD, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY et al.

Page 681

33 Md.App. 681 366 A.2d 756 Douglas L. ABBOTT
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING BOARD, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY et al. No. 1146. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Nov. 30, 1976.

[366 A.2d 757]

Page 682

Karl G. Feissner and Robert H. Levan, Hyattsville, with whom were Feissner, Garrity, Levan & Schimel, Hyattsville, on the brief, for appellant.

Ellis J. Koch, Deputy County Atty. and David E. Grover, Associate County Atty., with whom was James C. Chapin, County Atty., on the brief, for appellees.

Argued before MARVIN H. SMITH ^* and John C. ELDRIDGE ^* and J. HAROLD GRADY, ^** JJ.

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

We are presented with the question of whether the provisions of the Prince George's County Merit System Ordinance and the County Charter governing employee appeals from administrative disciplinary actions are, when applied to cases involving police officers, preempted by the statewide public general law known as the 'Law-Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights.'

The 'Law-Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights' was enacted by the Legislature as Ch. 722 of the Acts of 1974, as amended by Ch. 809 of the Acts of 1975, and is codified in Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol.), Art. 27, §§ 727-734A. The purpose of these enactments was to guarantee that certain procedural safeguards be offered to police officers during any investigation and subsequent hearing which could lead to disciplinary action, demotion, or dismissal. A member of a police department 'of any county's is expressly covered by the Law-Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights, Art. 27, § 727(b)(3). The law sets forth specific standards for the investigation of alleged misconduct, including the place and time of any interrogation of the officer, and

Page 683

requires that a written record be kept of the interrogation, Art. 27, § 728. If the investigation results in the recommendation of some disciplinary action such as demotion, a full hearing must be held, affording the police officer the right to counsel, the right to present evidence, and the right to cross-examine witnesses, Art. 27, § 730. The hearing is held before a 'hearing board,' chosen by the chief of police and comprised of other law-enforcement officers, Art. 27, § 727(c). The written decision of the hearing board, accompanied by findings of fact, must be sent to the officer, Art. 27, § 731. An appeal from the decision of the hearing board may be taken to the circuit court pursuant to Maryland Rule B2, Art. 27, § 732. There is no provision for an appeal beyond the circuit court.

The provisions of the Prince George's County Charter and ordinances governing disciplinary actions involving merit system employees, including police officers, are similar. While no provisions govern the conduct of a pre-hearing investigation of an employee, the chief of police may appoint a trial board of subordinates to hear charges against an officer and to submit recommendations of appropriate action to the chief, Prince George's County Code (1967, 1970 Supp.), § 13-96. If disciplinary action is to be taken, written notice must be sent to the employee stating the reasons for such action and informing the employee of the right to reply within three days, § 13-97. However, as opposed to the procedure provided in the Law-Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights, an additional [366 A.2d 758] administrative appeal to the County Personnel Board is provided, §§ 13-100, 13-102; Prince George's County Charter, § 907(3) An appeal from the Personnel Board's decision may then be taken to the circuit court, § 13-103. As with the Law-Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights, there is no provision for an appeal from the decision of the circuit court.

On October 9, 1974, a Police Administrative Hearing Board was convened to hear charges against Sergeant Douglas Abbott of the Prince George's County Police

Page 684

Department, accusing him of violations of the County Personnel Ordinance as well as Police Department Regulations. The charges arose from Abbott's conduct in responding to a broadcast from the Police Communications Center to arrest an individual on an assault charge. Specifically, Abbott was charged with 'unsatisfactory performance' in his contact with the suspect and with improper discharge of a firearm in violation of police regulations.

After hearing extensive testimony concerning the incident, the hearing board sent, on October 15, 1974, its findings of fact and recommendation of disciplinary action to the Chief of Police of Prince George's County. The hearing board found Sergeant Abbott guilty of the charges and recommended that he be demoted to the rank of Police Corporal and suspended for a period of ten days without pay. On October 24, 1974, the Chief of Police notified Sergeant Abbott that he concurred in the hearing board's findings and that the recommended disciplinary action would become effective on October 25, 1974. Sergeant Abbott was also notified of his right to appeal from this action to the Circuit Court for Prince George's County within thirty days.

Sergeant Abbott took timely appeals to both the circuit court and the Prince George's County Personnel Board. On November 18, 1974, the County filed in the circuit court a motion to stay the administrative appeal, contending that under the Law-Enforcement...