Abdur'Rahman v. Bell

Decision Date22 April 2002
Docket NumberNo. 01-9094.,01-9094.
Citation535 U.S. 1016
PartiesABDUR'RAHMAN <I>v.</I> BELL, WARDEN.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Gonzalez v. Secretary for Dept. of Corrections
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 26 April 2004
    ...interpreted our prior Felker decision, but anticipated that the Supreme Court would soon decide in Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, 535 U.S. 1016, 122 S.Ct. 1605, 152 L.Ed.2d 620 (2002) (mem.) (granting certiorari on April 22, 2002), whether all Rule 60(b) motions are subject to the restrictions appli......
  • Abdur'Rahman v. Bredsen, No. M2003-01767-COA-R3-CV (TN 10/6/2004)
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • 6 October 2004
    ...certiorari petition pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 46.2. Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, 538 U.S. 973, 123 S. Ct. 1780 (2003). 15. Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, 535 U.S. 981, 122 S. Ct. 1463 (2002). 16. Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, 535 U.S. 1016, 122 S. Ct. 1605 17. Mr. Abdur'Rahman later voluntarily dismissed his open me......
  • Lazo v. U.S., 02-12483.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 16 December 2002
    ...the Mobley court chose to stay Mobley's execution pending the upcoming decision of the Supreme Court in Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, 535 U.S. 1016, 122 S.Ct. 1605, 152 L.Ed.2d 620 (2002). The Court granted certiorari in Abdur'Rahman to answer the question of whether every Rule 60(b) motion constit......
  • Scheidler v. Nat'L Organization for Women, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 22 April 2002
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT