Abercrombie v. State
Decision Date | 17 June 1948 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 764. |
Parties | Dudley ABERCROMBIE v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and L. E. Barton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the petition.
George Rogers, of Birmingham, opposed.
Petition of the State, by its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Abercrombie v. State, Ala.App., 36 So.2d 111.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals does not furnish information as to the contents of the record sufficient for us to determine whether the contentions made in this petition should be sustained. The writ is denied without considering whether those contentions are well taken.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Green v. State
...32 So. 704; Bowman v. State, 35 Ala.App. 420, 47 So.2d 657; Abercrombie v. State, 33 Ala.App. 581, 36 So.2d 111, certiorari denied 250 Ala. 701, 36 So.2d 115. Charges 2-B, 3-A and 6 were refused without error for the reasons stated in Koch v. State, 115 Ala. 99, 22 So. 471. See Crews v. Sta......
-
Ingram v. State
...its refusal unless the evidence is entirely circumstantial. Abercrombie v. State, 33 Ala.App. 581, 36 So.2d 111, certiorari denied 250 Ala. 701, 36 So.2d 115; Brown v. State, 33 Ala.App. 97, 31 So.2d 670 reversed on other grounds, 249 Ala. 5, 31 So.2d 681; Ledbetter v. State, 34 Ala.App. 35......
-
Widner v. State
...33 Ala.App. 97, 104, 31 So.2d 670 (1946). See also Abercrombie v. State, 33 Ala.App. 581, 585, 36 So.2d 111, cert. denied, 250 Ala. 701, 36 So.2d 115 (1948), cited by the defendant in Cheney v. State, 172 Ala. 368, 55 So. 801 (1911), and Cheney v. State, 178 Ala. 44, 59 So. 604 (1912), cite......
-
King v. State, 6 Div. 49
...of the crime beside the testimony of Clint Townley. Abercrombie v. State, 33 Ala.App. 581, 36 So.2d 111, certiorari denied 250 Ala. 701, 36 So.2d 115; Wilson v. State, 34 Ala.App. 219, 39 So.2d 250, certiorari denied 251 Ala. 676, 39 So.2d We have already detailed the statements made to the......