Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Blair |
| Citation | Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson, 8 S.W.2d 558 (Tex. App. 1928) |
| Decision Date | 27 June 1928 |
| Docket Number | (No. 7250.) |
| Parties | ACCIDENTAL OIL MILLS v. TOMLINSON. |
Appeal from District Court, Williamson County; Cooper Sansom, Judge.
Suit by W. E. Tomlinson against the Accidental Oil Mills. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Tyler & Hubbard, of Belton, for appellant.
Spell, Naman & Penland, of Waco, for appellee.
Appellee sued appellant, Accidental Oil Mills, a corporation, to recover $1,944.40, alleged to be the balance due on his annual salary as general manager of appellant for the year beginning July 20, 1926, and on a trial to the court without a jury recovered judgment for that amount. This appeal is based upon the sole proposition that the evidence does not support the judgment. We do not sustain the contention.
The evidence shows that J. D. Sugg incorporated appellant, became its president, and owned all its stock save two shares. On July 20, 1919, he employed appellee as general manager of the corporation, at an annual salary of $5,000, payable in equal monthly installments, which employment continued without any other arrangements being made until Sugg's death in August, 1925. After Sugg's death, E. S. Briant qualified as independent executor and took charge of the stock and mill properties which under the will were bequeathed to parties designated here as "the McGowans." The executor did not make any new arrangements with appellee, but, according to him, appellee "just stayed on like he had been doing." The legatees never had any dealings directly with appellee, who continued to perform his duties as general manager up to July 20, 1927. Neither the executor nor the legatee notified him that his services were no longer needed until some time in the spring of 1927. Some time prior to 1927, the legatees were tendered the stock of said corporation, but for some reason not disclosed by the record they refused to accept it until early in 1927. Their attorney and the executor told appellee in the spring of 1926 that they were attempting to sell the mills, but they did not do so until September, 1926, which was after the contract year here involved had begun.
We think the evidence detailed above sufficiently supports the judgment rendered. It is the settled law in this state that a contract of employment from year to year can be terminated (except for good cause) only at the end of the year, and that, if at the expiration of the year the employee continues to perform his services, the contract impliedly renews itself for a period of one year. Crater Oil Co. v. Voorhies (Tex. Civ. App.) 280 S. W. 849; Dodson-Braun Mfg. Co. v. Dicks (Tex. Civ. App.) 76 S. W. 451; Tex. Brewing Co. v. Walters (Tex. Civ. App.) 43 S. W. 548; Young v. Lewis, 9 Tex. 73.
But appellant further insists in this connection as follows:
We do not take this view of the matter. Unquestionably the corporation did not cease to exist upon the death of its principal...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Tynan v. KSTP, Inc.
...Ins. Co., supra; Montgomery v. Board of Education, 102 Ohio St. 189, 193, 131 N.E. 497, 498, 15 A.L.R. 715.9 Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson, Tex.Civ.App., 8 S.W.2d 558; National Manufacture & Stores Corp. v. Dekle, 48 Ga.App. 515, 173 S.E. ...
-
Fenno v. Jacobe
...Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Davidson, 38 S.W.2d 634 (Tex.Civ.App.--Galveston 1931, no writ); Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson, 8 S.W.2d 558 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1928, error ref'd); Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. Nicolini, 96 S.W. 84, 91 (Tex.Civ.App.--1906, error ref'd); 56 C.J.S. Master & ......
-
Winograd v. Willis
...the minimum duration of the contract. See Molnar, 705 S.W.2d at 225; Lackey, 203 S.W.2d at 561; Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson, 8 S.W.2d 558, 559 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1928, writ ref'd) ("[I]f at the expiration of the year the employee continues to perform his services, the contract impl......