Achilles v. Willis

CourtTexas Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtGaines
CitationAchilles v. Willis, 16 S.W. 746, 81 Tex. 169 (Tex. 1891)
Decision Date22 May 1891
PartiesACHILLES <I>et ux.</I> v. WILLIS <I>et al.</I>

Appeal from district court, Travis county; W. M. KEY, Judge.

John R. Peel, for appellants. R. C. Walker, for appellees.

GAINES, J.

This action was brought by appellants to restrain the appellees from selling two lots or parcels of land in the city of Austin, under execution. The plaintiffs claimed that the lots constitute their homestead, and that, therefore, they were exempt from forced sale. On one of the parcels known as "Lot 12," in block 19, was situated a dwelling-house; and the other, called the "Lavaca-Street Property," was distant some three or four blocks from the other, and had upon it a butcher's shop and a part of a stable. The injunction was dissolved as to the latter, but was perpetuated as to the former, lot. The appellees have not assigned errors, and therefore the sole question before us is whether or not the court erred in holding the Lavaca-Street lot subject to forced sale.

The plaintiff Andreas Achilles testified that he bought lot 12, in block 19, as a residence for his family in 1886, and that they moved upon the lot, and made their home there for some three or four months; that he then rented the property, and made his family residence in the second story of a house leased by him, and used as a place of business, but that he never intended to abandon lot 12 as his homestead. He also testified that in 1887 he bought the Lavaca-Street lot, which was on the opposite side of the street from his business house. He also testified "that he used this property as a wood-yard till he failed, in December, 1887; that in January, 1888, his brother, A. H. Achilles, bought the stock of goods from his trustee, and run the business, including the wood-yard business, up to March 31, 1890, till after the levy; that during that time he clerked for his brother and had no interest in the business; * * * that the Lavaca-Street lot has a stable on it, half of the stable being on his lot, and the other half on the adjoining lot; that the middle of the stable is his line, and that the stable runs back east 76 feet; that the stable is about 30 feet wide; that there is a bedroom in the corner of the stable on his part about 8 feet square; that there is a butcher shop in the S. W. corner of his lot about 20½ by 14½ feet, and a shed-room to it, 14½ feet by 8 feet; that the shop and shed-room buildings do not belong to him; that they belong to August Hoecke, and were...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Moser v. Bank of Tyler (In re Loggins)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • April 21, 2014
    ... ...          It is axiomatic that a Texas resident can have only one homestead. Achilles v. Willis, 81 Tex. 169, 171, 16 S.W. 746 (1891); Kendall Builders, Inc. v. Chesson, 149 S.W.3d 796, 807 (Tex.App.–Austin 2004, no pet.). It is ... ...
  • Bexar Appraisal Dist. v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 7, 2024
    ...248, 6 S.W. 177, 179 (1887) (emphasis added). The "head of a family is not entitled to two residence homesteads" Achilles v. Willis, 81 Tex. 169,16 S.W. 746, 746 (1891) (emphasis added).8a The phrase "residence homestead" was not a novelty estranged from any other homestead. If anything, it......
  • Kendall Builders, Inc. v. Chesson
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 12, 2004
    ... ...         A family is not entitled to two homesteads at the same time. Tex. Const., art. XVI, § 51; Achilles v. Willis, 81 Tex. 169, 16 S.W. 746, 746 (1891). In Texas cases involving simultaneous ownership of more than one property, the establishment of ... ...
  • Salomon v. Lesay
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 30, 2012
    ... ... See Silvers v. Welch, 127 Tex. 58, 91 S.W.2d 686, 687 (1936) (citing Tex. Const. art. XVI, § 51); Achilles v. Willis, 81 Tex. 169, 16 S.W. 746, 746 (1891). Also, because the constitutional homestead exemption is given to the family, not to either spouse ... ...
  • Get Started for Free