Ackerman v. Burgard, Nos. 9883

• Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
• Writing for the Court: HANSON; RENTTO
• Citation: 109 N.W.2d 10,79 S.D. 119
• Decision Date: 25 April 1961
• Docket Number: 9884,Nos. 9883
• Parties: Frances A. ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Nick BURGARD, doing business as Burgard and Sons, Defendant and Appellant. Frank J. ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Nick BURGARD, doing business as Burgard and Sons, Defendant and Appellant.

Page 10

109 N.W.2d 10 79 S.D. 119 Frances A. ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Nick BURGARD, doing business as Burgard and Sons, Defendant
and Appellant.
Frank J. ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Nick BURGARD, doing business as Burgard and Sons, Defendant
and Appellant. Nos. 9883, 9884. Supreme Court of South Dakota. April 25, 1961.

[79 S.D. 120] Maynes & Myers, Aberdeen, Blaine Simons, Sioux Falls, for defendant-appellant.

H. I. King, Aberdeen, for plaintiffs-respondents.

HANSON, Judge.

In these two actions which have been consolidated for purposes of appeal the plaintiffs, Frank J. Ackerman and Frances A. Ackerman, are husband and wife. The

Page 11

trial court rendered default judgments in favor of each plaintiff in separate actions for damages against the defendant, Nick Burgard, doing business as Burgard and Sons. Defendant has appealed from orders denying motions to vacate such judgments. Only case No. 9884, wherein Frank J. Ackerman is plaintiff, has been briefed by counsel. To avoid needless repetition we will follow the same [79 S.D. 121] pattern in this opinion as both cases involve the same issue.

The defendant Burgard is a contractor engaged in the installation of sewer and water mains. He resides and conducts his business in and near the City of Aberdeen, South Dakota. He elected to come within the provisions of the South Dakota Workmen's Compensation Law and procured a workmen's compensation policy from the Gorder Insurance Agency in Aberdeen. The policy was issued by the Western Surety Company of Sioux Falls and covered defendant's employees from May 19, 1957 to May 19, 1958.

The plaintiff, Frank J. Ackerman, also a resident of Aberdeen, was employed by defendant as a laborer. In May or June 1957 plaintiff went to Adams, North Dakota to work on one of defendant's projects. On June 28, 1957 he was injured by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. On July 5, 1957 defendant made a written report of the injury to the Western Surety Company through its agent, the Gorder Ins. Agency of Aberdeen. Defendant also filed a supplemental report on November 9, 1957, a copy of which was sent to the South Dakota Industrial Commissioner. Plaintiff wrote a letter to the South Dakota Industrial Commissioner on July 24, 1957 requesting information concerning his claim.

On August 1, 1957 the Western Surety Company wrote the following letter to plaintiff and sent copies to defendant, the Gorder Insurance Agency, plaintiff's doctor, the hospital where plaintiff had been confined, and the South Dakota Industrial Commissioner:

'Dear Mr. Ackerman:

'Your employer, John Burgard, reported your injury that occurred at Adams, North Dakota, on June 28th under his South Dakota Workmen's Compensation policy of which we are the carrier.

[79 S.D. 122] 'It has now been found that this claim should have been reported under his North Dakota policy as you were working in North Dakota at the time and it would not apply to our policy which only governs South Dakota operations. It is, therefore, necessary for us to decline liability and believe you are corresponding with the North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau and will receive benefits from them accordingly.

'We wanted you to know that we can not help you with this matter but should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us accordingly.'

Defendant had no other compensation coverage and plaintiff's application for compensation in North Dakota was denied. On December 5, 1957, the Western Surety Company sent a draft to the Gorder Insurance Agency payable to Frank J. Ackerman in the amount of $89.51 in payment of hospital and doctor bills. Plaintiff refused to accept such check. The record also shows that between August 1, 1957 and March 10, 1959 there was considerable correspondence regarding plaintiff's claim. This correspondence was largely between plaintiff's counsel and the Western Surety Company in which defendant did not participate.

Defendant was served with a summons in the present common-law action for damages on March 10, 1959. The complaint was never served. Defendant delivered the summons to the Gorder Insurance Agency on the day it was served. R. F. Gorder advised him that his compensation carrier would take care of the matter. From time to time thereafter defendant inquired of the

Page 12

Gorder Insurance Agency and was repeatedly assured the matter was being taken care of by the Western Surety Company and his interests would be protected. Defendant received no further notice and heard nothing further until he read an account in the Aberdeen American News that judgment had been [79 S.D. 123] taken against him on December 21, 1959. He immediately consulted counsel and commenced proceedings to have the judgment vacated and set aside. After reviewing defendant's proposed answer and affidavits of merits the trial court refused relief for the following reasons: (1) defendant was not free from neglect, (2) defendant was estopped to claim he carried workmen's compensation insurance covering plaintiff's injury, and (3) to set aside the judgment would substantially prejudice plaintiff. The question on appeal is whether the trial court...