Acklin v. State
Decision Date | 28 April 2000 |
Citation | 790 So.2d 975 |
Parties | Nicholas Bernard ACKLIN v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
John G. Butler, Jr., Huntsville; and Robert B. Tuten, Huntsville, for appellant.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen.; and Michael B. Billingsley, J. Clayton Crenshaw, and James R. Houts, asst. attys. gen., for appellee.
Nicholas Bernard Acklin appeals from his convictions for capital murder and for two counts of attempted murder. Acklin was tried before a jury on the charges that he intentionally murdered Charles Lamar Hemphill, Michael A. Beaudette, Johnny Couch, and Brian Carter, pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct (§ 13A-5-40(a)(10), Ala.Code 1975), and that he attempted to murder Ashley Rutherford and Michelle Hayden (§ 13A-6-2 and § 13A-4-2, Ala.Code 1975). Following a guilty verdict, the jury recommended by a 10-2 vote that Acklin be sentenced to death by electrocution. On August 24, 1994, the trial court sentenced Acklin to 20 years' imprisonment for each count of attempted murder, to be served consecutively, and ordered him to pay a fine of $10,000 and a $10,000 victims compensation assessment for each count. For the capital murders, the trial court sentenced Acklin to death. This appeal follows. We affirm.
The State's evidence tends to show the following, as set out in the trial court's sentencing order:
(C. 280-84.)
Acklin argues that his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection and his right to a fair and impartial jury were denied because, he says, African-Americans were underrepresented on the grand jury that indicted him and the jury venire from which the petit jury was struck. Acklin argues that the facts that no African-Americans were selected to sit on the grand jury and that only 10 African-Americans were selected as part of the 100-person venire established evidence of a systematic exclusion of African-Americans in the Madison County jury selection process.
Facts presented at trial indicated that the African-American population in Madison County represents 19.2 % of the total population of the county. The grand jury and the jury venire were randomly selected from a combination of the list of residents of Madison County to whom driver's licenses had been issued and the nondriver's license identification card list for Madison County. The grand jury was selected by a judge who randomly pulled 18 names from a bowl containing the names on both lists. The jury venire was selected by a computer program that randomly selected 100 names from the combined lists. Acklin argues that the change in the procedure from a manual selection of names pulled from a bowl to the use of a computer program is further...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Capote v. State
...that accurately depict the nature of a victim's wounds are admissible even if they are gruesome or cumulative. Acklin v. State, 790 So. 2d 975 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000). The autopsy photographs were relevant and admissible to show the extent of the wounds to Freeman's body. Each photograph was......
-
State v. Courchesne
...reveals that such cases have involved the application of the heinous factor to at least two murders. See, e.g., Acklin v. State, 790 So. 2d 975, 1001 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 936, 121 S. Ct. 2565, 150 L. Ed. 2d 729 (2001) (evidence that defendant beat, humiliated and t......
-
McGowan v. State
...803, 107 L.Ed.2d 905 (1990)." 776 So.2d at 837-38. See also Gavin v. State, 891 So.2d 907 (Ala.Crim.App.2003); Acklin v. State, 790 So.2d 975, 984-86 (Ala. Crim.App.2000). Based on the foregoing, we conclude that McGowan failed to meet his burden of proving that African-Americans and female......
-
Woodward v. State
...See, e.g., Gobble v. State, [Ms. CR-05-0225, Feb. 5, 2010] ____ So. 3d ____, ____ (Ala. Crim. App. 2010)(quoting Acklin v. State, 790 So. 2d 975, 1002 (Ala. Crim. App. 2002)). A prosecutor may argue every legitimate inference from the evidence "and may examine, collate, shift and treat the ......