Adams v. State
Decision Date | 12 May 1942 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 414. |
Citation | 30 Ala.App. 487,8 So.2d 219 |
Parties | ADAMS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Baldwin County; F. W. Hare, Judge.
The Governor's warrant is as follows:
Hybart & Chason, of Bay Minette, for appellant.
Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Noble J. Russell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Linka Adams is duly charged by indictment in the State of New York with grand larceny. The case pending before us originated in an extradition proceeding for her return to the State of New York, as a fugitive from justice (Code of Alabama 1940, Title 15, § 48 et seq.), to answer said indictment.
She presented her petition for habeas corpus to Honorable F. W. Hare, Circuit Judge of Baldwin County, and from his order, denying her release from custody of the sheriff, she appeals to this court.
The return of the sheriff to the writ of habeas corpus showed: "That he has said Linka Adams in his custody and is detaining her under and by virtue of a Governor's warrant, issued by Hon. Frank M. Dixon, Governor of Alabama, on the 29th day of November, 1941, commanding him to arrest the said Linka Adams and deliver her into the custody of Timothy L. Collins, the duly authorized agent of the State of New York, said Governor's warrant being submitted to your Honor herewith and made a part of this return."
The warrant of the Governor of Alabama (which the Reporter of Decisions will set out, omitting formal parts), exhibited with the return of the sheriff, is in substance identical with the warrants, heretofore approved as sufficient, in the cases of State v. Floyd Edward Shelton, Ala.App., 8 So.2d 216; Pool v. State, 16 Ala.App. 410, 78 So. 407; State v. Parrish, Ala.Sup., 5 So.2d 828.
The principle was reaffirmed in the Shelton case, supra, that, "in proceedings as this, when the requisition warrant of the Governor of the asylum state contains the requisite jurisdictional recitals, a prima facie case is established for the legal detention of the prisoner."
Upon authority of these cases, and others of similar import, it must be held that the Governor's warrant in ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Boykins
...("The writ of habeas corpus is concerned solely with the lawfulness of the present holding of the petitioner." (citing Adams v. State, 30 Ala.App. 487, 8 So.2d 219 (1942))); Williams v. State, 42 Ala.App. 140, 140, 155 So.2d 322, 323 (1963)("`It should always be borne in mind that the appli......
-
Collins v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections, CR-03-0285.
...(`The writ of habeas corpus is concerned solely with the lawfulness of the present holding of the petitioner.' (citing Adams v. State, 30 Ala.App. 487, 8 So.2d 219 (1942))); Williams v. State, 42 Ala.App. 140, 140, 155 So.2d 322, 323 (1963)('"It should always be borne in mind that the appli......
-
Block v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections, CR-04-1417.
...(`The writ of habeas corpus is concerned solely with the lawfulness of the present holding of the petitioner.' (citing Adams v. State, 30 Ala.App. 487, 8 So.2d 219 (1942))); Williams v. State, 42 Ala.App. 140, 140, 155 So.2d 322, 323 (1963) (`"It should always be borne in mind that the appl......
-
Jacobs v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
...(`The writ of habeas corpus is concerned solely with the lawfulness of the present holding of the petitioner.' (citing Adams v. State, 30 Ala.App. 487, 8 So.2d 219 (1942))); Williams v. State, 42 Ala.App. 140, 140, 155 So.2d 322, 323 (1963)(`"It should always be borne in mind that the appli......