Adams v. State, 369S41
Decision Date | 25 July 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 369S41,369S41 |
Citation | 284 N.E.2d 757,259 Ind. 164 |
Parties | Charles Wayne ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Bangs, Mills & Rollo, by C. W. H. Bangs, H. D. Rollo, Huntington, for appellant.
Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., of Indiana, Robert F. Hassett, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
This case involves the infliction of the death penalty on the appellant as the result of his being found guilty of murder in the first degree, having killed the companion of a girl whom he also raped.We affirmed the judgment of the trial court which imposed the death penalty; DeBruler, J. dissenting with Prentice, J. concurring therein and also dissenting by separate opinion.Adams v. State (1971) Ind., 271 N.E.2d 425.
The appellant has filed a petition for rehearing raising the constitutionality of the death penalty.We have delayed ruling upon this petition pending the determination of the United States Supreme Court of that question.
On June 29, 1972, that Court handed down nine separate opinions, the majority of the Justices thereof holding that the death penalty was unconstitutional in the cases before it, but a majority not delineating any standards for determining when it might possibly be constitutional.Furman v. Georgia(1972), 405 U.S. ---, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 32 L.Ed.2d ---.
Each Justice having his own separate reason, Chief Justice Burger said:
Since there is no majority of the Court on the ultimate issue presented in these cases, the future of capital punishment in this country has...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Judy v. State
...but did not delineate any standards for determining when it might possibly be constitutional. This Court, in Adams v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 164, 165, 284 N.E.2d 757, 758 (opinion on rehearing), found that the pronouncements of Furman v. Georgia left the constitutionality of our statutes an......
-
Com. v. Harrington
...v. State, 229 Ga. 731, 732, 194 S.E.2d 410 (1972). People v. Speck, 52 Ill.2d 284, 286--287, 287 N.E.2d 699 (1972). Adams v. State, 284 N.E.2d 757, 758 (Ind.1972). State v. Randol, 212 Kan. 461, 469--471, 513 P.2d 248 (1973). Caine v. Commonwealth, 491 S.W.2d 824, 832 (Ky.1973), cert. den. ......
-
Wright v. State
...Indiana Criminal Sentencing and Death Penalty Law (1993-2012) , 49 Ind. L. Rev. 1349, 1366 & n.147 (2016) (citing Adams v. State , 259 Ind. 164, 284 N.E.2d 757, 758 (1972) ).11 Although often deemed "qualitatively different from the death penalty, the punishment of life imprisonment without......
-
Brewer v. State
...considerations or manifestly unreasonable. Since 1972, we have vacated death sentences in eight (8) cases. In Adams v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 164, 165, 284 N.E.2d 757, 758 (opinion on rehearing) it was in response to the holding in Furman v. Georgia which left the constitutionality of the s......