Adams v. Wright

Decision Date04 April 1901
PartiesADAMS v. WRIGHT. [1]
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from chancery court, Bullock county; W. L. Parks, Chancellor.

Petition of D. J. Adams, guardian of Charles Wright, for writ of habeas corpus against R. E. Wright. Petition dismissed, and petitioner appeals. Dismissed.

Norman & Baldwin and J. M. Chilton, for appellant.

Jinks & Blue, for appellee.

SHARPE, J.

This appeal is certified as coming from the chancery court. It appears that the cause was both submitted to the chancellor and decided by him between the time fixed by law for the adjournment of the September term, 1899, of the chancery court and the next legal term of that court. It does not appear that there was a written consent to the rendition of a decree in vacation. Unless a cause be submitted during the sitting of the court, and held over by the chancellor as provided by chancery rule 79 and section 845 of the Code, or there be a consent in writing for a decree in vacation according to rule 80 of chancery practice, a final decree in vacation is unauthorized. The chancery court has no power to sit or act at a time not authorized by law, and any decree attempted to be rendered out of term time except in pursuance of special provisions of the statutes or rules is void. Ex parte Branch, 63 Ala. 383. A void decree can neither be affirmed nor reversed, and does not support an appeal. The appeal must be dismissed.

---------

Notes:

[1] Rehearing denied.

---------

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 23, 1930
    ...is absolutely void. Wynn et al. v. McCraney et al., 156 Ala. 630, 46 So. 854; Hodo v. State, 156 Ala. 43, 47 So. 134; Adams v. Wright, 129 Ala. 305, 30 So. 574. prevailing opinion assumes that the thing attacked by the cross-bill is a record, and applies to it the principles applicable to j......
  • Zaner v. Thrower
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1919
    ... ... decrees in vacation, contrary to said rules, are void. Ex ... parte Branch, 63 Ala. 383; Adams v. Wright, 129 Ala ... [84 So. 823] Alder v. Van Kirk ... Land & Const. Co., 114 Ala. 551, 21 So. 490, 62 Am.St.Rep ... 133, that the ... ...
  • Jones v. Muse
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • October 27, 1959
    ...and the appeal must be dismissed. Barnes v. Evans, 267 Ala. 236, 101 So.2d 331; Shade v. Shade, 252 Ala. 134, 39 So.2d 785; Adams v. Wright, 129 Ala. 305, 30 So. 574. See, also, 2 Ala.Dig.Appeal and Error Appeal dismissed. ...
  • Durst v. Haenni
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • February 10, 1913
    ...of Gadsden (Ala.) 39 South, 569; Leslie v. Tucker, 57 Ala. 486; David v. David, 56 Ala. 49; Pettus v. McKinney, 56 Ala. 41; Adams v. Wright, 129 Ala. 305, 30 So. 574; Wertheimer Ridgeway, 157 Ala. 398, 47 So. 569; Campbell & Martin v. Chandler, 37 Tex. 33; Alexander v. Segee et al., 101 Me.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT