Adamson v. Auditor & Treasurer

Citation9 Ind. 174
PartiesAdamson v. The Auditor and Treasurer of Warren County
Decision Date29 May 1857
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Warren Circuit Court.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

R. A Chandler, for the appellant.

Benjamin F. Gregory, and Jesse Harper, for appellees.

OPINION

Perkins J.

Suit by Adamson against the auditor and treasurer of Warren county to recover back the amount of tax paid by the plaintiff which tax was assessed by the trustees of Mound township, in said county, for the year 1853, for the building of school-houses. The tax was assessed by the trustees, after a vote of the township, at the April election, in its favor. The complaint was demurred to, the demurrer sustained, and the defendant had final judgment.

According to the decision in Maize v. State, 4 Ind. 342, the provision of the school law giving the right to the citizens of the township to vote taxes, etc., is unconstitutional.

According to the decision Greencastle etc. v. Black, 5 Ind. 557, the provision in that law authorizing township trustees to assess taxes for paying teachers of common schools, is unconstitutional, because the power of voting taxes for that purpose is vested by the constitution in the legislature alone. As to such taxes the law must be uniform throughout the state. Iuick v. White- Water Township, 7 Ind. 570; Quick v. Springfield Township, 7 Ind. 636.

But the constitutional requirement does not reach to the subject of taxes for building school-houses, etc. These are left within the power of township trustees, and no more uniformity can be required as to them, than there can be as to those for building court-houses and jails in the different counties. The law conferring the authority to tax must be general, not special; but the exercise of the power need not be uniform throughout the state. That may vary with the wants, tastes, and abilities of different localities.

If, then, the trustees had the power to levy the tax complained of, the law conferring it being constitutional, and the section authorizing the vote of the citizens was unconstitutional, thus rendering the vote a nullity, the tax was legally levied by the trustees, without regard to that vote. It did not vitiate the exercise of a power valid without the vote.

We think the trustees were empowered to levy the tax. See section 32, 1 R. S. p. 444, in connection with the other provisions of the law. See, also, the school law of 1855 ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Bonner ex rel. Bonner v. Daniels
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • May 2, 2008
    ...authorized such were unconstitutional because the uniformity of the common school system would be destroyed); Adamson v. Auditor & Treasurer of Warren County, 9 Ind. 174 (1857) (although statutes conferring to township trustees the power to tax must be general, exercise of such power need n......
  • Nagy v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • May 28, 2004
    ...authorized such were unconstitutional because the uniformity of the common school system would be destroyed); Adamson v. Auditor & Treasurer of Warren County, 9 Ind. 174 (1857) (although statutes conferring to township trustees the power to tax must be general, exercise of such power need n......
  • Robinson v. Schenck
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1885
    ...to doubt its soundness. There are behind that case many decisions affirming the principle there given expression. Adamson v. Auditor, 9 Ind. 174;Rose v. Bath Tp. 10 Ind. 18;City of Lafayette v. Jenners, Id. 70; Conwell v. O'Brien, 11 Ind. 419;Covington, etc., Co. v. Auditor, 14 Ind. 331;Nil......
  • Robinson v. Schenck
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1885
    ... 1 N.E. 698 102 Ind. 307 Robinson, Treasurer, v. Schenck No. 12,277 Supreme Court of Indiana June 18, 1885 ...           From ... many decisions affirming the principle there given ... expression. Adamson v. Auditor, etc., 9 ... Ind. 174; Rose v. Bath Tp., 10 Ind. 18; ... City of Lafayette v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT