Aday v. United States

Decision Date12 June 1967
Docket NumberNo. 149,149
Citation388 U.S. 447,87 S.Ct. 2095,18 L.Ed.2d 1309
PartiesSanford E. ADAY et al. v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Stanley Fleishman, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall, for the United States.

Melvin L. Wulf, Rolland R. O'Hare and Erwin B. Ellmann, for the American Civil Liberties Union and others, as amici curiae.

Horace S. Manges, for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., as amicus curiae.

Charles H. Keating, Jr., and James J. Clancy, for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., as amicus curiae.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.Redrup v. State of New York, 386 U.S. 767, 87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BRENNAN would grant the petition, vacate the judgment, and remand in light of A Book Named 'John Cleland's' Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure v. Attorney General of Com. of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1.

Mr. Justice CLARK would grant the petition and affirm.

Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the reversal on the basis of the reasoning set forth in his opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
50 cases
  • People v. Adler
    • United States
    • California Superior Court
    • 21 Marzo 1972
    ...Court said simply, 'reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515) (1967),' Aday v. United States (1967), 388 U.S. 447, 87 S.Ct. 2095, 18 L.Ed.2d 1309. It may be that 'hard-core pornography' is no more than a 'personal obscenity divining rod.' (Kuh, Supra, at pp.......
  • People v. Luros
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 18 Febrero 1971
    ...They argue that since the United States Supreme Court later held that 'Sex Life of a Cop' was Not obscene (Aday v. United States, Supra, 388 U.S. 447, 87 S.Ct. 2095, 18 L.Ed.2d 1309), the grand jury in this case was permitted and advised to use an erroneous example of contemporary community......
  • United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • 10 Febrero 1971
    ...S.Ct. 233, 19 L.Ed.2d 46; Books Inc. v. United States, 1967, 388 U.S. 449, 87 S.Ct. 2098, 18 L.Ed.2d 1311; Aday v. United States, 1967, 388 U.S. 447, 87 S.Ct. 2095, 18 L.Ed. 1309. Cases Involving State Statutes: Bloss v. Dykema, 1970, 398 U.S. 278, 90 S.Ct. 1727, 26 L.Ed.2d 230; Conner v. C......
  • Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton 8212 1051
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 21 Junio 1973
    ...2093, 18 L.Ed.2d 1306 (1967); Avansino v. New York, 388 U.S. 446, 87 S.Ct. 2093, 18 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1967); Aday v. New York, 388 U.S. 447, 87 S.Ct. 2095, 18 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1967); Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449, 87 S.Ct. 2098, 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967); A Quantity of Copies of Books v.......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Pornography and Politics: the Court, the Constitution, and the Commission
    • United States
    • Sage Political Research Quarterly No. 24-4, December 1971
    • 1 Diciembre 1971
    ...v. New York, 388 U.S. 443 (1967) ;Shepherd v. New York, 388 U.S. 444 (1967); Avansino v. New York, 388 U.S. 446(1967); Aday v. U.S., 388 U.S. 447 (1967); Corinth Publication, Inc. v. Wesberry,388 U.S. 448 (1967); Books, Inc. v. U.S., 388 U.S. 449 (1967); Rosenbloom v. Vir-ginia, 388 U.S. 45......