Addison v. CNX Gas Co.

Decision Date30 September 2013
Docket NumberCase No. 1:10CV00065
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
PartiesDORIS BETTY ADDISON, ETC., Plaintiff, v. CNX GAS COMPANY, INC., ET AL., Defendants.
ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS

By: James P. Jones

United States District Judge

Before the court are Defendant CNX Gas Company LLC's Objctions to the Magistrate Judge's Class Certification Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 212) and Buckhorn Coal Company, Commonwealth Coal Corporation and Harrison-Wyatt, LLC's Objections to Magistrate Judge Sargent's Report and Recommendations of June 5, 2013 (ECF No. 211) (collectively, "Objections"), which Objections have been fully briefed and argued. Based upon my de novo consideration of the matters to which the Objections were directed, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Objections are DENIED;

2. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 204) are ACCEPTED, provided that the class definition is modified as set forth below herein; 3. The Motion for Class Certification, Appointment of Class Counsel, and Appointment of Class Representative (ECF No. 118) is GRANTED and this action is hereby certified as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a), 23(b)(2), and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

4. The class certified (the "Class") is defined as follows:

Each person, or their successors-in-interest, who has been identified by CNX Gas Company, LLC, or its predecessors ("CNX") as the owner and lessor of gas estate interests in a tract included in a coalbed methane gas ("CBM") unit operated by CNX in Buchanan, Russell, and/or Tazewell County, Virginia, and whose ownership of the CBM attributable to that tract has been further identified by CNX as being in conflict with a person or persons identified by CNX as owning coal estate interests and not gas estate interests in the tract, according to filings made by CNX with the Virginia Gas and Oil Board ("the Board") and/or according to orders entered by the Board pursuant to CNX's filings.
The Class excludes (a) the defendants; (b) any person who serves as a judge in this civil action and his or her spouse; (c) any gas estate owner who has entered into a written agreement with a purported coal estate owner settling alleged conflicting claims of CBM ownership between them, provided, however, that this exclusion does not extend to those interests or rights of any such gas estate interest owner regarding lands, CBM units, CBM royalties, and/or CBM proceeds
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT