Aderholt v. Smith

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCLOPTON, J.
CitationAderholt v. Smith, 83 Ala. 486, 3 So. 794 (Ala. 1888)
Decision Date24 February 1888
PartiesADERHOLT ET AL. v. SMITH.

Appeal from circuit court, St. Clair county; LEROY F. BOX, Judge.

This is a special action on the case brought by M. M. Smith against the several persons composing the firm of D. A. Aderholt &amp Co. Upon the trial of the case the defendants demurred to the complaint, but the court overruled the demurrer, and the defendants excepted, and now assign the overruling of the said demurrer as error.

Samuel F. Rice, for appellant.

J W. Inzer, for appellee.

CLOPTON J.

The plaintiff, having obtained a judgment against P. Holmes caused W. T. Helton to be summoned as garnishee, who appeared and answered that he had some cotton in his possession belonging to the judgment debtor, but suggested that it was claimed by the defendants in the present suit. Thereupon notice was issued to them under the statute, in response to which they appeared and propounded their claim. On the trial, judgment was rendered against the claimants, and condemning the cotton to the satisfaction of the plaintiff's judgment. During the pendency of the claim suit, the defendants obtained from the garnishee, who is insolvent, possession of the cotton, and converted it to their own use. The sole question is whether the plaintiff on these facts can maintain a special action on the case against the defendants. In Kelly v. McCaw, 29 Ala. 227, it was held that an action on the case does not lie against a party who fraudulently and wrongfully induced the sheriff to deliver possession of personal property, on which he had levied an execution in favor of plaintiff against a third person, which such party had removed beyond the reach of the court, though the defendant in execution was insolvent. The decision rests on the principle that by the seizure of the chattels the sheriff acquired a special property, and became...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Pryor Motor Co. v. Hartsfield
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 8 Junio 1922
    ...would have a full, complete, and adequate remedy at law for the recovery of any damages to which he might be entitled. Aderholt v. Smith, 83 Ala. 486, 3 So. 794; Torbert v. McFarland, 172 Ala. 117, 55 So. 311. such a case equity will not interfere. Friedman v. Fraser, 157 Ala. 191, 47 So. 3......
  • Skates v. Hartsfield
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1927
    ...Pryor Motor Co. v. Hartsfield, 207 Ala. 646, 93 So. 524, or where there is an adequate remedy at law for the damages, Aderholt & Co. v. Smith, 83 Ala. 486, 3 So. 794, Torbert v. McFarland, 172 Ala. 117, 55 So. 311, Friedman v. Fraser, 157 Ala. 191, 47 So. 320, 22 Cyc. 816, note 52, and will......
  • Britt v. Pitts
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 16 Junio 1896
    ... ... duty, may recover his damages thereby occasioned in this form ... of action. Kent v. Long, 8 Ala. 44; Aderholt v ... Smith, 83 Ala. 486, 3 So. 794 ... All the ... facts in the complaint having been proved without conflict, ... the plaintiff was ... ...
  • Mathis v. Tennessee & C.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 24 Febrero 1888
  • Get Started for Free