Adler v. Adler

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore CARRO
CitationAdler v. Adler, 610 N.Y.S.2d 22, 203 A.D.2d 81 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Decision Date07 April 1994
PartiesJane R. ADLER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joel A. ADLER, Defendant-Appellant.

Before CARRO, J.P., and WALLACH, ASCH, NARDELLI and WILLIAMS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered August 4, 1993, which awarded plaintiff counsel fees and arrears in this post-matrimonial enforcement proceeding, and required defendant to post $75,000 per year in escrow with plaintiff's counsel pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 243 as security to insure future payment of certain additional expenses set forth in the parties' settlement agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in ordering defendant to post the security in lieu of sequestration without a hearing as defendant manifested a "pattern of nonpayment" (see Scheinkman, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons.Laws of N.Y., Book 14, Domestic Relations Law C243:1, at 736; see, Kornblau v. Kornblau, 60 A.D.2d 531, 400 N.Y.S.2d 43). The award of the money judgment for arrears without a hearing was also proper as defendant failed to request a hearing or raise any triable issues of fact (see, Gunsburg v. Gunsburg, 173 A.D.2d 232, 569 N.Y.S.2d 641). Fi...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Maniscalco v. Maniscalco
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 27, 2013
    ...cash, bank accounts, stocks and mutual funds ( cf. Brinckerhoff v. Brinckerhoff, 53 A.D.3d 592, 593, 862 N.Y.S.2d 98;Adler v. Adler, 203 A.D.2d 81, 81, 610 N.Y.S.2d 22). We thus further modify the judgment accordingly. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously m......
  • Welch v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 7, 1994
  • Adler v. Adler
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 15, 1996
    ...in a settlement agreement incorporated but not merged into the parties' divorce judgment (see, e.g., Adler v. Adler, 203 A.D.2d 81, 610 N.Y.S.2d 22; 176 A.D.2d 162, 574 N.Y.S.2d 45). Since awards of attorneys' fees were authorized under Domestic Relations Law §§ 237 and 238 and "relate[d] t......
  • Krinsky v. Krinsky
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 11, 1994
    ...which would warrant a hearing to determine his ability to comply with the provisions of the judgment of divorce (see, Adler v. Adler, 203 A.D.2d 81, 610 N.Y.S.2d 22; Lewis v. Lewis, 194 A.D.2d 648, 599 N.Y.S.2d 606; Penziner v. Penziner, 123 A.D.2d 674, 507 N.Y.S.2d 45). Accordingly, it was......
  • Get Started for Free