Adler v. First Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 07 January 1937 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 23 |
Parties | ADLER et al. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF BIRMINGHAM. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; E.M. Creel, Judge.
Bill in equity by the First National Bank of Birmingham, as trustee for Mary W. Persons, against Ike Adler and others. From a decree overruling a demurrer to the bill, respondents appeal.
Affirmed.
Wm. S Pritchard and David R. Solomon, both of Birmingham, for appellants.
Cabaniss & Johnston and K.E. Cooper, all of Birmingham, for appellee.
Bill by appellee, the First National Bank of Birmingham, as trustee for Mary W. Persons, against appellants to foreclose mortgage.
It appears from the bill that the appellants on May 13, 1929 executed and delivered to the First National Bank of Birmingham a mortgage on certain described property in the city of Birmingham, Ala., to secure the payment of their indebtedness to said bank in the principal sum of $10,000 which was evidenced by one principal note in said amount, due three years after date. The said principal sum bore interest from date at 7 per cent. per annum, payable semi-annually and to evidence the interest payments six separate interest notes were executed and delivered to said bank.
It is averred in the bill that the funds used for making the loan secured by said mortgage were funds belonging to said bank as trustee for Mary W. Persons.
It appears from the bill that the said notes and mortgage of appellants, the said Ike Adler, Everett Shepherd, and A. Page Sloss, were "duly transferred and assigned" on June 25, 1929, by the First National Bank of Birmingham to the First National Bank of Birmingham as trustee for said Mary W. Persons.
It further appears that the said Mary W. Persons on September 17, 1929, executed a "declaration of trust" to the First National Bank of Birmingham; that under the terms and provisions of said declaration of trust the First National Bank of Birmingham acquired and holds certain property and assets, including said notes and mortgage, in trust for the use and benefit of the said Mary W. Persons. A copy of the declaration of trust is attached to and made a part of the bill.
Among other provisions the trust agreement contains the following:
Default was made by the mortgagors in the payment of the mortgage indebtedness, and this bill was filed to foreclose the mortgage.
The respondents filed numerous grounds of demurrer to the bill as a whole, and separately to its several phases.
The court overruled the demurrers, and from the interlocutory decree the respondents bring this appeal.
It is a well-settled rule of equity pleading that the complainant's title should be stated with sufficient clearness and certainty to enable the court to see clearly he has such a right as warrants it in taking jurisdiction. Every essential fact necessary to make out his title to maintain the bill must be set forth. McKinley v. Irvine, 13 Ala. 681, 693; Cockrell v. Gurley, 26 Ala. 405; Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Co., 64 Ala. 330; Overton v. Moseley, 135 Ala. 599, 33 So. 695; Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Co. v. Town of Eutaw, 202 Ala. 143, 79 So. 609; Ezzell v. Richardson et al., 221 Ala. 346, 128 So. 783.
It is first insisted that the bill is fatally defective in that it is nowhere averred in the bill whether the complainant "is composed of persons, is a partnership, or is a corporation."
The insistence does not approach merit. It is averred in the second paragraph of the bill that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mudd v. Lanier
... ... enforce a security or collect a debt for the estate ... Adler v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, 233 Ala ... 325, 171 So. 904; ... ...
-
J. C. Jacobs Banking Co. v. Campbell
...and the beneficiary, as when the trustee is seeking to enforce a security or collect a debt for the estate. Adler v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, 233 Ala. 325, 171 So. 904; Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank, 231 Ala. 565, 165 So. 827, and cases there cited; and when some person is seeking in......
-
Spann v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery
... ... Such a ... suit may be maintained at law. American Bonding Co. v ... Fourth National Bank, 205 Ala. 652, 88 So. 838. Such ... being the character of this suit, the guardian was a ... necessary party. Silverstein et al. v. First National ... Bank, 231 Ala. 565, 165 So. 827; Adler et al. v ... First National Bank, 233 Ala. 325, 171 So. 904; ... Kelly v. Wilson et al., 234 Ala. 455, 175 So. 551 ... And ... indeed in these authorities the holding was such suits were ... maintainable by the guardian with no necessity that the ward ... be a party thereto ... ...
-
Christian v. Rabren
...the case which he is called upon to defend. Swann v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 241 Ala. 286, 2 So.2d 770; Adler v. First National Bank of Birmingham, 233 Ala. 325, 171 So. 904. The same precision of statement is not generally required in equity as at law, and the certainty with which av......