Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Miriam S. (In re Isaac S.)

Citation111 N.Y.S.3d 877 (Mem),178 A.D.3d 829
Decision Date11 December 2019
Docket NumberDocket Nos. NN-04462-17, NN-04463-17, V-21506-17,2018-06302,2018-05457,2018-00639
Parties In the MATTER OF ISAAC S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Miriam S. (Anonymous), et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Faigy S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Miriam S. (Anonymous), et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2)
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

178 A.D.3d 829
111 N.Y.S.3d 877 (Mem)

In the MATTER OF ISAAC S. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services, Respondent;
v.
Miriam S. (Anonymous), et al., Appellants.
(Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Faigy S. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Respondent;
v.
Miriam S. (Anonymous), et al., Appellants.
(Proceeding No. 2)

2018-00639
2018-05457
2018-06302
Docket Nos.
NN-04462-17, NN-04463-17, V-21506-17

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—October 17, 2019
December 11, 2019


Miriam S., Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Israel S., Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Deborah A. Brenner and Zachary S. Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.

Denise S. Siler, New York, N.Y., attorney for the child Isaac S.

Rhonda R. Weir, Brooklyn, N.Y., attorney for the child Faigy S.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, HECTOR D. LASALLE, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

178 A.D.3d 829

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) a temporary order of protection of the Family Court, Kings County (Ilana Gruebel, J.), dated November 14, 2017, (2) a temporary order of protection of the same court dated May 9, 2018, and (3) an order of the same court dated May 1, 2018, and the father separately appeals from the temporary order of protection dated May 9, 2018, and order dated May 1, 2018. The temporary order of protection dated November 14, 2017, directed the mother and the father to stay away from the two subject children until and including March 5, 2018. The temporary order of protection dated May 9, 2018, directed the mother and the father to stay away from the two subject children until and including June

25, 2018. The order dated May 1, 2018, directed the mother and the father to obtain the court's permission before filing any further motions in these proceedings.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Jones v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth., 2017-06870
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 11, 2019
    ...544 ; Matter of Gagedeen v. Ponte, 170 A.D.3d at 1014, 96 N.Y.S.3d 349 ). The record demonstrates that the NYCTA made the determination 178 A.D.3d 829 to terminate the petitioner's employment after he failed to complete his "course of study or training" successfully (Personnel Rules and Reg......
  • Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Lisa B. (In re Nicholas M.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2022
    ...consequences on the mother (see Matter of Zaylynn J. [Benni J.], 187 A.D.3d 753, 755, 130 N.Y.S.3d 359 ; Matter of Isaac S. [Miriam S.], 178 A.D.3d 829, 829, 111 N.Y.S.3d 877 )." ‘Following a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act §§ 1027 or 1028, if the court finds that removal is necessary ......
  • Wahab v. Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLC
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • March 10, 2021
    ...actions or motion practice without prior written approval of the court (see Rossrock Fund II, L.P. v Toledo, supra; Matter of Isaac S., 178 A.D.3d 829, 830, 111 N.Y.S.3d 877 [2d Dept 2019]; Vogelgesang v Vogelgesang, 71 A.D.3d 1132, 1134, 899 N.Y.S.2d 272 [2d Dept 2010]). Notwithstanding th......
  • Lamb v. Unknown Offices of Mental Hygiene Dep't
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • February 25, 2021
    ...actions or motion practice without prior written approval of the court (see Rossrock Fund II, L.P. v Toledo, supra; Matter of Isaac S., 178 A.D.3d 829, 830, 111 N.Y.S.3d 877 [2d Dept 2019]; Vogelgesang v Vogelgesang, 71 A.D.3d 1132,1134, 899 N.Y.S.2d 272 [2d Dept 2010]). Notwithstanding tha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT