Admission to Bar of Com., Matter of
| Decision Date | 06 July 1979 |
| Citation | 378 Mass. 795,392 N.E.2d 533 |
| Parties | In the Matter of an Application for ADMISSION TO the BAR OF the COMMONWEALTH. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
The applicant, pro se.
John F. Dunn, Boston, for Board of Bar Examiners.
Before HENNESSEY, C. J., and QUIRICO, KAPLAN and LIACOS, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
This is an appeal from a decision of a single justice of this court denying the applicant's application to be admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth. The applicant took the July, 1977, bar examination, which consisted of one part multiple choice questions and one part essay questions. A combined score of fifty was the passing grade; she received a combined score of 49.5. The Board of Bar Examiners (Bar Examiners) had a policy of reconsidering the answers to the essay portion of the examination of those applicants who received a combined score of between forty-eight and fifty. Accordingly, the Bar Examiners reconsidered the applicant's essay part of the examination and she received a mark which qualified her for an oral interview if in the opinion of the Bar Examiners such an interview was warranted.
On November 17, 1977, the applicant, with eight other applicants, appeared before the Bar Examiners for an informal oral interview. As a result of information obtained at that interview, the Bar Examiners decided to grant the applicant a formal hearing as to her character and fitness to be admitted to the bar. She was advised that she could be represented by counsel, have witnesses on her behalf and cross-examine any witnesses who testified. At the hearing on February 24, 1978, witnesses testified to the conduct and demeanor of the applicant in and around the court houses in several counties. Thereafter, on May 13, 1978, the Bar Examiners held a further hearing as to complaints filed by the applicant with the Board of Bar Overseers against three attorneys who testified at the February 24 hearing. At the hearing, the applicant stated that she was contemplating the filing of further complaints.
Subsequently, the Bar Examiners reported to this court that the applicant is not qualified for admission as an attorney. Thereafter the Chief Justice of this court, on request of the applicant, ordered a hearing before a single justice of this court. S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 5.2, as amended, 370 Mass. 909 (1976). After hearing, the single justice remanded the matter to the Bar Examiners for findings...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Prager, Matter of
...The license to practice law may not be withheld arbitrarily or discriminatorily. Matter of an Application for Admission to the Bar of the Commonwealth, 378 Mass. 795, 392 N.E.2d 533 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1046, 100 S.Ct. 734, 62 L.Ed.2d 732 (1980). While deference is given to the de......
-
In the Matter of Moore, SJC-09089 (MA 8/9/2004)
...who failed to file tax returns and fraudulently applied for and received unemployment compensation); Matter of an Application for Admission to the Bar, 378 Mass. 795 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1046 (1980) (admission denied to applicant who filed complaints with the Board of Bar Overseer......
-
In the Matter of Moore
...who failed to file tax returns and fraudulently applied for and received unemployment compensation); Matter of an Application for Admission to the Bar, 378 Mass. 795 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1046 (1980) (admission denied to applicant who filed complaints with the Board of Bar Overseer......
-
Desy v. Board of Bar Examiners
...G.L. c. 221, § 37." Matter of Prager, 422 Mass. 86, 91, 661 N.E.2d 84 (1996). See Matter of an Application for Admission to the Bar of the Commonwealth., 378 Mass. 795, 795, 392 N.E.2d 533 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1046, 100 S.Ct. 734, 62 L.Ed.2d 732 (1980) (single justice properly den......