Advisory Opinion to the Governor

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; Glenn Terrell
Citation96 So.2d 541
PartiesADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR.
Decision Date09 July 1957

Page 541

96 So.2d 541
ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR.
Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc.
July 9, 1957.

Page 542

PER CURIAM.

Supreme Court of Florida

Glenn Terrell, Chief Justice

Tallahassee

July 9, 1957

Honorable LeRoy Collins,

Governor of Florida,

State Capitol,

Tallahassee, Florida.

Dear Sir:

We have your letter of June 218 1957, which, omitting formal parts, reads as follows:

'The State Constitution authorizes me, as Governor, to request the written opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court as to the interpretation of any portion of the State Constitution upon any question affecting my executive duties and powers (Section 13, Article IV, State Constitution [F.S.A.]). Under Section 14, Article IV, of the said Constitution, 'all grants and commissions shall be in the name and under the authority of the State of Florida, sealed with the Great Seal of th State, signed by the Governor, and countersigned by the Secretary of State,' pursuant to which it becomes my official duty to commission additional circuit judges to fill vacancies in the office of circuit judge. When such additional circuit judges are selected and appointed it will become my duty to issue them a commission. In order for me to issue such commissions it is necessary that the term for which the commission is to run be determined.

'Judicial article 'V' of the State Constitution was amended at the general election of 1956, and as amended will become 'effective on the first day of July 1957, and shall replace all of Article 'V' and shall supersede any other provisions of the present Constitution of Florida in conflict' (Subsection one of Section 26, of said Article 'V' as amended). Under the Constitution the Legislature is authorized to 'provide for one circuit judge in each circuit for each fifty thousand inhabitants or major fraction thereof according to the last census authorized by law.' (Section 6 of said Article V, as amended). Provision has been made in the Florida Statutes, as to several of the judicial circuits of the state, for the appointment of circuit judges to fill vacancies due to increases of population in such circuits. Provision has also been made by Chapter 31395, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1956 [F.S.A. § 26.011], for the taking of a census for any judicial circuit, in the manner therein provided, for the purpose of determining the population of such circuit and in consequence thereof whether there exists a vacancy in the office of circuit judge. Several of such censuses have been taken and others are contemplated which will authorize additional judgeships.

'Under Section 46, Article V, of the Constitution, prior to the said amendment to Article V, circuit judges were required to be elected, at the general election in 1948, for terms of six years each, and every six years thereafter. Under Section 15 of said amended Article V of the State Constitution, 'election of circuit judges shall be held in the year 1960 and every six years thereafter.' These constitutional provisions clearly indicate an intention to make the office of circuit judge elective and place them on a uniform six year cycle term; beginning with the general election in 1948. Prior to 1948, when the office of circuit judge became elective, such office was an appointive one (Advisory Opinion [to Governor], 152 Fla. 686, 12 So.2d 876).

'Under Section 14 of said Article V, as adopted at the general election in 1956,

Page 543

'when the office of any judge shall become vacant for any cause, the successor to fill such vacancy shall be appointed or elected only for the unexpired term of the judge whose death, resignation, retirement or other cause created such vacancy.' This Section continued without change the provisions of Section 33, Article V of the State Constitution, as the same existed prior to the said amendment at the general election in 1956. In addition to the said Section 14, Section 6, Article XVIII of the State Constitution provides that 'the term of office for all appointees to fill vacancies in any of the elective offices under this constitution shall extend only to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January next after the election and qualification of a successor.' Section 7 of said article XVIII provides that 'in all cases of election to fill vacancies in office such election shall be for that part of the unexpired term commencing on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January next after such election.' The problem presented is should appointments of circuit judges made between the first of July 1957 and the general election in 1958 be made until the first Tuesday after the first Monday in 1959 or to the same time in 1961. Or, since there is an apparent conflict, which is controlling, Section 14, Article V, as amended, or said Sections 6 and 7 of Article XVIII?

'Although we find no opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida, or an advisory to the Governor, directly in point, the following may have some application to the questions hereinafter mentioned: Prior to the time the office of circuit judge became an elective one, commissions of persons appointed to the office of circuit judge, and confirmed by the Senate, extend to the end of the unexpired term (Advisory Opinion [to Governor], 45 Fla. 154, 34 So. 571; [In re] Advisory Opinion [to the Governor], 76 Fla. 649, 80 So. 519; [In re] Advisory Opinion [to Governor], 93 Fla. 1024, 113 So. 115), and such appointments, made by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate, were independent of preceding appointments to the end of the session (Advisory Opinion [to Governor], 147 Fla. 157, 2 So.2d 378). Where there was a vacancy in the office of circuit judge, the justices (Advisory Opinion [to Governor], 152 Fla. 686, 12 So.2d 876) advised the Governor to issue a commission 'until the end of the next ensuing session of the Senate unless an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 practice notes
  • Burnsed v. Seaboard Coastline R. Co., No. 43651
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • February 6, 1974
    ...the former must be adopted so that both provisions may stand and have effect. State v. Butler, supra; Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 96 So.2d 541 (Fla.1957). Construction of the constitution is favored which gives effect to every clause and every part thereof. Unless a different interest......
  • Gray v. Bryant
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • December 19, 1960
    ...mode for filling the subject vacancies, the provisions of Section 7, Article IV, are not applicable. This Court in its Advisory, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 541, reached the same conclusion for no reference whatsoever is made therein to Section 7, Article Section 6, Article XVIII, is the next sectio......
  • City of Concord v. State, No. 2011–462.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Hampshire
    • August 31, 2012
    ...can reasonably be construed so as to avoid conflict, such a construction should be adopted."); Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 96 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1957) ("[W]here a constitutional provision will bear two constructions, one of which is consistent with, and the other inconsistent with, a......
  • Advisory Opinion of Governor Request of November 19, 1976 (Constitution Revision Commission), In re
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 19, 1976
    ...the former must be adopted so that both provisions may stand and have effect. State v. Butler, supra; Advisory Opinion to Governor, 96 So.2d 541 (Fla.1957). Construction of the constitution is favored which gives effect to every clause and every part thereof. Unless a different interest is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Burnsed v. Seaboard Coastline R. Co., No. 43651
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • February 6, 1974
    ...the former must be adopted so that both provisions may stand and have effect. State v. Butler, supra; Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 96 So.2d 541 (Fla.1957). Construction of the constitution is favored which gives effect to every clause and every part thereof. Unless a different interest......
  • Gray v. Bryant
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • December 19, 1960
    ...mode for filling the subject vacancies, the provisions of Section 7, Article IV, are not applicable. This Court in its Advisory, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 541, reached the same conclusion for no reference whatsoever is made therein to Section 7, Article Section 6, Article XVIII, is the next sectio......
  • City of Concord v. State, No. 2011–462.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Hampshire
    • August 31, 2012
    ...can reasonably be construed so as to avoid conflict, such a construction should be adopted."); Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 96 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1957) ("[W]here a constitutional provision will bear two constructions, one of which is consistent with, and the other inconsiste......
  • Advisory Opinion of Governor Request of November 19, 1976 (Constitution Revision Commission), In re
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 19, 1976
    ...the former must be adopted so that both provisions may stand and have effect. State v. Butler, supra; Advisory Opinion to Governor, 96 So.2d 541 (Fla.1957). Construction of the constitution is favored which gives effect to every clause and every part thereof. Unless a different interest is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT