Advisory Opinion to the Governor, In re, 84-424-M
| Decision Date | 02 November 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-424-M,84-424-M |
| Citation | 483 A.2d 1078 |
| Parties | In re ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR. P. |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
We received from Your Excellency, pursuant to section 2 of article XII of the amendments to the Rhode Island Constitution, a request for our advice regarding the recent case of Police and Firefighter's Retirement Association of Providence v. Norberg, R.I., 476 A.2d 1034 (1984). In that case the court ruled that the Providence city police and firefighters' pensions are exempt from the state personal income tax law, G.L.1956 (1980 Reenactment) chapter 30 of title 44, more specifically § 44-30-12(c).
Now Your Excellency has specifically requested our advice in regard to the impact of the above-entitled case by posing the following inquiry:
"Does Police and Firefighter's et al. vs. Norberg, supra, apply by analogy to exempt all state employees, municipal employees and/or their respective beneficiaries who are the recipients of said pensions, annuities or retirement allowances and also certain pensions held in employees trust from the Rhode Island personal income tax law * * * ? " 1
It is clear that sec. 2 of art. XII of the amendments to our constitution requires the judges of this court, upon request, to "give their written opinion upon any question of law." It is settled that this provision is mandatory in nature when the inquiry falls within the purview thereof. We have on numerous occasions, however, stated our reluctance to subvert the principle of the separation of powers by translating the obligation to give advisory opinions upon request into a grant of authority to give such opinions in situations in which the inquiry is not such as reasonably to be within the purview of this constitutional provision. More specifically, the judges of the Supreme Court are constitutionally obligated to give their advice to Your Excellency when the question or questions propounded raise an issue regarding the constitutionality of existing statutes. Opinion to the Governor, 109 R.I. 289, 292, 284 A.2d 295, 296 (1971).
Ready as we are to meet our constitutional obligations and fully desirous of being of all possible assistance to Your Excellency, we nevertheless are constrained to conclude that the question advanced cannot serve as a proper basis...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor
...in the Superior Court pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, G.L.1956 chapter 30 of title 9. In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 483 A.2d 1078, 1079 (R.I.1984); see also In re Advisory from the Governor, 633 A.2d at 666; In re Advisory Opinion (Chief Justice), 507 A.2d 1316,......
-
Debernardis v. IQ Formulations, LLC
...to get an advisory opinion about whether a plaintiff alleging this kind of claim has standing to bring it. Cf. In re Advisory Op. to the Governor , 483 A.2d 1078, 1079 (R.I. 1984) ; Duncan v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., Inc. , 429 Ill.Dec. 190, 123 N.E.3d 1249, 1256–57 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019)......
-
Advisory Opinion to the Governor
...provision is mandatory in respect to inquiries that fall within the purview of this constitutional provision. In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 483 A.2d 1078, 1079 (R.I.1984). Nevertheless, this Court will generally refrain from advising the Governor on issues that do not have "a bear......
-
Advisory Opinion to the Governor, In re
...It is well settled that this provision is mandatory when the inquiry falls within its purview. In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, --- R.I. ---, ---, 483 A.2d 1078, 1079 (1984). "[The] requirement to give advisory opinions was included in the constitution in order to enable the executiv......