Aetna Life Insurance Co v. France Et Al
Decision Date | 01 October 1875 |
Citation | 91 U.S. 510,23 L.Ed. 401 |
Parties | AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. FRANCE ET AL |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Samuel C. Perkins for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Nathan H. Sharpless for the defendant in error.
The action was assumpsit to recover $10,000, the amount of a policy insured upon the life of Andrew J. Chew in July, 1865. The issuing of the policy, the death of Chew, and the service of the necessary proofs of his death, are not seriously disputed.
The policy contained the following clause:——
'And it is also understood and agreed to be the true intent and meaning hereof, that if the proposal, answers, and declaration made by said Andrew J. Chew, and bearing date the twelfth day of July, 1865, and which are hereby made part and parcel of this policy as fully as if herein recited, and upon the faith of which this agreement is made, shall be found in any respect false or fraudulent, then and in such case this policy shall be null and void.'
The issuing of the policy was preceded by a proposal for insurance, which contained a number of questions propounded to Chew by the company, with the answers made by him.
In relation to such questions and answers, the policy contained this clause:——
'It is hereby declared that the above are correct and true answers to the foregoing questions; and it is understood and agreed by the undersigned that the above statements shall form the basis of the contract for insurance, and also that any untrue or fraudulent answers, any suppression of facts in regard to the party's health, or neglect to pay the premium on or before the day it becomes due, shall render the policy null and void, and forfeit all payments made thereon.'
Among others were the following questions and answers; viz.:
'4. Q. Place and date of birth of the party whose life is to be insured?
'A. Born in 1835, interlined (Oct. 28), Gloster County, N. J.
'5. Q. Age next birthday?
'A. Thirty years.
'11. Q. Has the party ever had any of the following diseases? if so, how long, and to what extent?—palsy, dropsy, palpitation, spitting of blood, epilepsy, yellow fever, consumption, rupture, apoplexy, asthma, convulsions, paralysis, bronchitis, disease of the heart, disease of the lungs, insanity, gout, fistula, affection of the brain, fits.
A. None.'
Evidence upon both sides was given as to the age of Chew, tending to show that he was thirty-seven years old, or at least thirty-five years old, when he signed the application, and upon the question of his having suffered from a rupture. Before the case was submitted to the jury, a number of requests to charge were made by the judge, which will be referred to presently.
In its main features, this case bears a close resemblance to that of Jeffries v. Life Ins. Co., decided at the last term of this court. 22 Wall. 47. In that case, as in this, it was insisted that the falsity of a statement made in the application did not vitiate the policy issued upon it, unless the statement so made was material to the risk assumed. The opinion then delivered contains the following language in answer to that claim:——
'The proposition at the foundation of this point is this, that the statements and declaration made in the policy shall be true.
This decision is so recent, and so precise in its application, that it is not necessary to go back of it. It is only necessary to reiterate that all the statements contained in the proposal must be true; that the materiality of such statements is removed from the consideration of a court or jury by the agreement of the parties that such statements are absolutely true, and that, if untrue in any respect, the policy shall be void.
The judge was requested to charge,——
5. If the jury believe that the answers to questions Nos. 4 and 5 in the application for insurance, as to the date of birth, and age next birthday, of said Andrew J. Chew, were false and untrue, the policy issued upon the application is void, and their verdict must be for the defendants.
In response to this request, the judge said, 'If the jury believe that the answer to the questions numbered 4 and 5 were materially untrue as to the age of the said Andrew J. Chew, the policy is void, and the verdict must be for the defendants.' The defendants were entitled to the charge they requested, without the addition made by the judge of the word 'materially.' The judge, however, proceeded to say,
The process of reasoning by which the learned judge reached his conclusion on this point we have held to be erroneous: viz., that, to make the representation important, it must be material to the risk assumed; that the representation that he was but thirty years old, when he was thirty-seven, or even thirty-five,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Grand Fraternity v. Keatley
... ... It is ... well settled that every fact in an insurance application is ... material, which increases the risk, or which, if ... v. Schmidt (Ky.) 93 ... S.W. 1055; Insurance Co. v. France, 91 U.S. 510, 23 ... L.Ed. 401 ... The ... court below ... Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in the case of Hermany v ... Life Association, 151 Pa. 17, 24 A. 1064 ... This ... case is law ... ...
-
Donahue v. The Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
... ... Donahue, Deceased, v. THE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK No. 1915 Supreme Court of North Dakota July 9, 1917 ... ... 1 Misc. 374, 21 N.Y.S. 456; ... Miles v. Connecticut Mut. L. Ins. Co. 3 Gray, 580; ... AEtna L. Ins. Co. v. France, 91 U.S. 510, 23 L.Ed ... 401; Jeffries v. Economical Mut. Ins. Co. 22 ... ...
-
Aloe v. Mutual Reserve Life Association
...that construction which imposes upon the assured the obligations of a warranty. We do not think that case modifies the Jeffries or the France which by reason of different provisions in the contracts involved in those cases are governed by different rules, and so it is in regard to this case......
-
Whitmore v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor
... ... person has an insurable interest in his own life, and has a ... right to procure a policy on the same, and to have it made ... that is to be invoked to support the insurance. Ins. Co ... v. Allen, 138 Mass.24; Campbell v. Ins. Co., 98 ... Mass ... or not, the policy is void. Ins. Co. v. France, 91 ... U.S. 510; Jeffries v. Ins. Co., 22 Wall. 47; ... Brockway v ... be not material to the risk. AEtna Life Ins. Co. v ... France, 91 U.S. 510, 23 L.Ed. 401; Jeffries v. Life ... ...