Aguilera v. Jones
Decision Date | 10 March 2016 |
Docket Number | Case No. 15-20406-CIV-GAYLES/WHITE |
Parties | REYNYER AGUILERA, Petitioner, v. JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida |
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White's Supplemental Report of Magistrate Judge ("Report") [ECF No. 25] entered on January 13, 2016, as well as pro se Petitioner Reynyer Aguilera's Motion for Leave to Amend Objection to Magistrate's Recommendation [ECF No. 32]. The Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Court on February 3, 2015 [ECF No. 1] ("Petition"). The matter was referred to Judge White, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pretrial, nondispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. [ECF No. 3]. For the reasons that follow, the Petitioner's Motion shall be granted, the Court's prior Order of February 29, 2016 [ECF No. 30] shall be vacated, the Report shall be adopted in full, and the Petition shall be denied.
The Court recites only the facts pertinent to ruling on the instant Petition. The underlying charges arose when the Petitioner confronted his girlfriend when she returned from Miami Beach with a group of friends. The facts of the incident, as recited by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal and consistent with the record before this Court, are as follows:
Aguilera v. State, 970 So. 2d 1270, 1271-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (footnotes omitted).1 The Petitioner was charged in Florida case number 02-24536 with second-degree murder with a firearm, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon (asp or baton), aggravated battery with a deadly weapon (firearm), and display or use of a firearm while committing a felony. Report at 3.
At trial, the Petitioner's court-appointed counsel conceded during his opening statement that the Petitioner had used a gun to strike the victim and that the gun accidentally discharged, and therefore had committed manslaughter. Id. at 4. The trial judge placed the Petitioner under oath and underwent a colloquy in which he asked the Petitioner whether he agreed with his counsel's strategy of conceding guilt to manslaughter. Id. The Petitioner stated that he agreed with counsel's strategy, understood that manslaughter was punishable by up to thirty years' imprisonment, and that he faced a twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentence up to life under Florida's "10-20-life" statute, Fla. Stat. § 775.087.2 See Report at 5-6 (citing Trial Tr. at 27-30).
During the course of trial, the State called as a witness the police officer who first responded to the underlying incident, who testified that when he arrived at the scene, the Petitioner, without prompting, stated, and then, as the same officer patted him down, stated, Trial Tr. 521-23; 543-44. The officer further testified that the Petitioner later made several other unprompted statements while he was handcuffed in the back of the police vehicle, and the officer testified that he did not engage in conversation with or otherwise promptthe Petitioner into making those statements. Id. at 527-30. The Petitioner's counsel did not object to this testimony.
During closing argument, counsel for the State made the following three statements: first, that a State witness who made an excited utterance in a 911 call after the underlying shooting was telling the truth; second, that the Petitioner lied to the responding officer about where the gun was; and third, that the Petitioner lied about his concern regarding what transpired and for the victim. Trial Tr. at 1087-88, 1095-96. The Petitioner's counsel did not object to these statements.
The jury found the Petitioner guilty of second-degree murder, aggravated battery with a firearm, and using or displaying a firearm while committing a felony, with special findings that he discharged a firearm during the offense, killing the victim. Report at 6-7. The jury found the Petitioner not guilty of aggravated battery with a baton/asp. Id. The court adjudicated him guilty of the relevant charges and imposed a split sentence of forty years' imprisonment with a twenty-five year minimum mandatory for discharging a firearm, followed by ten years of supervised release for the second-degree murder. Id. at 7. The court also imposed a concurrent split sentence on the remaining counts of fifteen years' imprisonment—with a ten-year minimum mandatory for possession of a firearm—followed by ten years' probation. Id. The Petitioner's conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, see Aguilera, 795 So. 2d 1270, and the Florida Supreme Court denied a petition for discretionary review on September 19, 2008, see Aguilera v. State, 993 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 2008).
Judge White's Report accurately summarizes the Petitioner's post-conviction procedural history as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial