Aguirre v. United States
Decision Date | 02 August 2012 |
Docket Number | NO. 2:10-CV-276,NO. 2:06-CR-76,2:06-CR-76,2:10-CV-276 |
Parties | TOBIAS FLORES AGUIRRE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee |
Tobias F. Aguirre ("petitioner" or "Aguirre"), a federal prisoner, has filed a "Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody," [Doc. 100]. The United States has responded in opposition, [Doc. 112], and the time for any reply by Aguirre has passed.1 The matter is, therefore, now ripe for disposition. The Court has determined that the files and records in the case conclusively establish that Aguirre is not entitled to relief under § 2255 and no evidentiary hearing is necessary. For the reasons which follow, the petitioner's § 2255 motion lacks merit and will be denied and the case dismissed.
Alfonzo Chavez Rojas ("Rojas") and Emanuel Flores Sanchez (real name Tobias Flores Aguirre), were charged in this Court by criminal complaint on October 26, 2006, with distribution of 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amountof cocaine base, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A). [Doc. 1]. On November 7, 2006, Rojas and Aguirre were indicted by the federal grand jury in a ten count indictment, [Doc. 9]. Aguirre was charged in Count One, along with Rojas, with a conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine hydrochloride and 50 grams or more of cocaine base (crack), Schedule II controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B) and (b)(1)(A); in Count Five, along with Rojas, with the distribution of 50 grams or more of cocaine base (crack), a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841 (b)(1)(A); in Count Six with distribution of cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841 (b)(1)(C); in Count Seven with distribution of 50 grams or more of cocaine base (crack) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A); in Count Eight with distribution of cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C); in Count Nine with possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime (i.e. the drug trafficking crime charged in Count Eight), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and in Count Ten with unlawful reentry into the United States by an alien who had previously been deported and removed from the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Among other pretrial motions, the petitioner filed a motion to suppress items seized during the execution of a search warrant at the petitioner's residence at 1089 Wilburn Road, Whitesburg, Tennessee, on October 26, 2006, alleging that the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause. [Docs. 27, 28]. Among other items, thegovernment seized powder and crack cocaine, firearms and money from the Wilburn Road residence on October 26, 2006. On January 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation recommending that the motion to suppress be denied, [Doc. 41]. After objections to the report and recommendation by Aguirre, [Doc. 43], the Court adopted the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and petitioner's motion to suppress was denied on March 5, 2007. [Doc. 47]. After dismissal of Counts One and Ten, Aguirre proceeded to trial on Counts Five through Nine of the indictment on October 16, 2007. At the conclusion of a two day trial, a jury found Aguirre not guilty of Counts Five, Six and Seven but guilty as to Counts Eight and Nine. [Doc. 69].
A Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) was prepared by the United States Probation Office and disclosed to the parties on February 14, 2008. Aguirre's total offense level was established at 26 with respect to Count Eight which, with a criminal history category of I, resulted in a guideline range for imprisonment of 63 to 78 months. By statute, Aguirre faced a 60 month term of imprisonment as to Count Nine with that term of imprisonment to run consecutively to the sentence imposed as to Count Eight. Aguirre objected to the PSR; these objections were overruled by the Court, and on March 17, 2008, petitioner was sentenced to 78 months of imprisonment as to Count Eight and a consecutive, statutorily-mandated term of 60 months of imprisonment as to Count Nine, for an effective sentence of 138 months. Judgment was entered on March 28, 2008. [Doc. 83]. Petitioner then appealed and on May 17, 2010, the Sixth Circuit affirmed petitioner's convictions and sentence. United States v. Aguirre, 605 F.3d 351 (6th Cir. 2010). Petitioner's § 2255 motionwas then timely filed on December 20, 2010.
The facts in the case were summarized by the Sixth Circuit in its opinion as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial