Ahmed v. Houk

• Decision Date: 21 September 2020
• Docket Number: Case No. 2:07-cv-658
• Parties: NAWAZ AHMED, Petitioner, v. MARK C. HOUK, Respondent.
• Court: U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio

NAWAZ AHMED, Petitioner, v. MARK C. HOUK, Respondent.

Case No. 2:07-cv-658

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

September 21, 2020

JUDGE WATSON

Magistrate Judge Merz

OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner, a prisoner sentenced to death by the State of Ohio, has pending before this Court a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.This matter is before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations ("R&R"), ECF No. 88, in which the Magistrate Judge recommended denying relief on all of Petitioner's habeas claims.This matter is also before the Court on Petitioner's Corrected Objections to the R&R, ECF No. 150, the Warden's response, ECF No. 151, andPetitioner's Reply, ECF No. 155.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)andFederal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the Undersigned has made a de novo review of the record in this case.Upon said review, the Court finds all of Petitioner's objections to the R&R to be without merit.The CourtOVERRULESPetitioner's objections and ADOPTS the R&R.While reaching the same conclusions as the Magistrate Judge, the Court adds the following analysis.

I.Factual and Procedural History

In 2001, a jury convicted Petitioner of four counts of Aggravated Murder and sentenced him to death in Belmont County, Ohio, for the murders of his wife Lubaina Bhatti Ahmed, Lubaina's fatherAbdul Bhatti, Lubaina's sisterRuhie Ahmed, and Ruhie Ahmed's two-year old daughter, Nasira Ahmed.The Ohio Supreme Court set forth the facts of this case as follows:

In October 1998, Lubaina hired an attorney to end her marriage with [Ahmed] and to secure custody of their two children, Tariq and Ahsan.According to Lubaina's divorce attorney, [Ahmed] did not want a divorce, and consequently, it was a hostile divorce proceeding.In early February 1999, shortly after the complaint for divorce had been filed, Lubaina was awarded temporary custody of the children and exclusive use of the marital residence.Later that month, the divorce court issued a restraining order to prevent [Ahmed] from coming near Lubaina or making harassing phone calls to her.

[Ahmed] had accused Lubaina, a physician, of having an affair with another physician, and claimed that their oldest son, Tariq, was not his.A subsequent paternity test showed that claim to be false.According to Lubaina's divorce attorney, Grace Hoffman, Lubaina had been afraid of [Ahmed] and she had called Hoffman three or four times a week, "scared [and] frustrated * * *.It just kept escalating."Lubaina had also confided to Hoffman that [Ahmed] had forced her to have sex with him during the marriage.

Tahira Kahn, one of Lubaina's sisters, corroborated that Lubaina had feared [Ahmed].She also testified that Lubaina had told her that [Ahmed] had raped her repeatedly.

The owner of the rental home where Lubaina resided testified that Lubaina had called him in February 1999 and asked him to change the locks on the house.He stated that Lubaina had been very upset and had asked that he change them within the hour.

In March 1999, Lubaina complained to police that [Ahmed] washarassing her by telephone, but after the officer explained that the matter could be handled through criminal or civil proceedings, she decided to handle it through the ongoing divorce proceedings.The final divorce hearing was scheduled for Monday, September 13, 1999, and Lubaina had arranged for her sister Ruhie to fly in from California the Friday before to testify at the hearing.

On Friday, September 10, 1999, [Ahmed] called Lubaina's office several times.But Lubaina had instructed the medical assistants at her office to reject any phone calls from him.Then, at approximately 4:00 p.m. that day, Lubaina took [Ahmed's] call.[Ahmed] who worked and lived in Columbus, wanted Lubaina to bring the children to him for the weekend two hours earlier than planned.[Ahmed] claimed that he was planning a surprise birthday party for their youngest son.Lubaina, however, refused to change her plans and told [Ahmed] that he was using the birthday party as an excuse to inconvenience her.

Rafi Ahmed, husband of Ruhie and father of two-year-old Nasira, testified that Ruhie and Nasira had been scheduled to arrive in Columbus from California at 10:34 p.m. on Friday, September 10.Ruhie had planned to call Rafi that night when she arrived at Lubaina's home near St. Clairsville.However, since he had not heard from Ruhie, Rafi began calling Lubaina's home at 1:21 a.m., Saturday, September 11.Rafi called 20 to 25 times, but he got only Lubaina's answering machine.At approximately 3:00 a.m., he called the Belmont County Sheriff's Office.

A parking receipt found in Lubaina's van indicated that the van had entered a Columbus airport parking lot at 9:30 p.m. and exited at 11:14 p.m. on September 10, 1999.

Around 3:45 a.m. on September 11, in response to Rafi Ahmed's call, a sheriff's detective went to Lubaina's home and knocked on the doors and rang the doorbell.She got no answer.The detective also looked in the windows, but nothing at the home appeared to be disturbed.

Later that day, Belmont County Sheriff's Department DetectiveSteve Forro was assigned to investigate the missing persons.He recognized Lubaina's name because he was the officer who had talked to her regarding [Ahmed's] harassing phone calls.Forro called [Ahmed's] home to see if he had any information.[Ahmed] did not answer, soForro called Columbus police to have them check [Ahmed's] apartment.They did and found that he was not home.

Forro went to Lubaina's home at 2:18 p.m.As he walked around the outside of the house, he noticed a flicker of a car taillight through a garage window.Using a flashlight, he looked through the window and saw a van with its hatch open and luggage inside.He then saw the body of a man on the floor covered with blood.

Forro called for backup.Deputy Dan Showalter responded and entered through a side door, which he had found unlocked.He searched the house and found three more bodies on the basement floor.

Detective Bart Giesey found [Ahmed's] MCI WorldCom employee badge on the basement floor near the bodies.Records from [Ahmed's] employer, MCI WorldCom in Hilliard, Ohio, revealed that [Ahmed's] badge was last used at 7:19 p.m. on September 10, 1999.

Through several inquiries, police learned that [Ahmed] was scheduled to depart from JFK [International Airport in New York] for Lahore, Pakistan, that evening.Earlier that day, [Ahmed], through a travel agent, had booked a flight leaving for Pakistan that same evening.[Ahmed] arrived at the agent's home with both of his sons and asked if he could leave them with the agent, saying that his wife would pick them up soon.[Ahmed] wrote on the back of his and Lubaina's marriage certificate, which he gave to the agent, that he was leaving his sons to be handed over to his wife.[Ahmed] also signed his car over to the agent.The agent then drove [Ahmed] to JFK to catch his flight to Pakistan.

At 8:10 p.m., Robert Nanni, a police officer stationed at JFK, learned that [Ahmed] was a murder suspect and that he had checked in for a flight scheduled to leave for Pakistan at 8:55 p.m. [Ahmed] was located and arrested.Nanni noticed a large laceration on [Ahmed's] right thumb.Nanni read [Ahmed] his rights and called airport paramedics to attend to [Ahmed's] thumb.Among the items confiscated from [Ahmed] was an attaché case containing 15 traveler's checks totaling $7,500, his will, and $6,954.34 in cash.

On October 7, 1999, a grand jury indicted [Ahmed] on three counts ofaggravated murder for purposely and with prior calculation and design killing Lubaina, Ruhie, and Abdul, pursuant to R.C. 2903.01(A), and one count for the aggravated murder of Nasira, pursuant to R.C. 2903.01(C)(victim younger than 13).All four aggravated murder counts carried a death-penalty specification alleging a course of conduct involving the killing of two or more persons.R.C. 2929.04(A)(5).The aggravated murder count for Nasira carried an additional death-penalty specification alleging that the victim was younger than 13 years at the time of the murder.R.C. 2929.04(A)(9).

At trial, Dr. Manuel Villaverde, the Belmont County Coroner, testified that he had been called to the crime scene on September 11, 1999.All four victims appeared to have died from blood loss from slashes on their necks.Based on the condition of the bodies, he determined that the victims had been killed at approximately 3:00 a.m. that day, with two to four hours variation either way.

A deputy coroner for Franklin County performed autopsies on all four victims and concluded that each victim had died from skull fractures and a large cut on the neck.

Diane Larson, a forensic scientist at the DNA-serology section of the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation ("BCI"), concluded that the DNA of blood found in the kitchen of Lubaina's home matched [Ahmed's] DNA profile.The probability of someone else in the Caucasian population having that same DNA profile is 1 in 7.6 quadrillion, and in the African-American population, the probability is 1 in 65 quadrillion.

State v. Ahmed, 103 Ohio St. 3d 27, 27-30(2004).

On January 25, 2001, Petitioner was found guilty of the aggravated murders of Lubaina Bhatti Ahmed, Abdul Bhatti, Ruhie Ahmed, and Nasira Ahmed, as well as the death penalty specifications.ECFNo. 92-4, at PAGEID # 9185-9190.Following a mitigation hearing, the jury recommended a sentence of death on each of the four aggravated murder counts.ECFNo. 92-5, atPAGEID # 9477-78.After independently weighing the aggravating circumstances and mitigating factors, the trial court imposed a sentence of death.Id. at PAGEID # 9550-51.

On direct appeal, the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed Petitioner's convictions and sentence and overruled each of Petitioner's nineteen propositions of law.State v. Ahmed, 103 Ohio St. 3d 27(2004).Subsequently, the Ohio Supreme Court denied Petitioner's ...