Ahola v. Sincock
Decision Date | 03 February 1959 |
Citation | 94 N.W.2d 566,6 Wis.2d 332 |
Parties | Janie Lee AHOLA, by her gdn. ad litem, Daniel I. D'Amico, et al., Appellants, v. H. A. SINCOCK, Respondent. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
Daniel I. D'Amico, Cumberland, Harry T. Lathrop, Duluth, Minn., for appellants.
R. Charles Banker, Superior, Johnson, Fritschler, Barstow & Witkin, Superior, for respondent.
The plaintiff was taken to St. Mary's hospital in Superior, Wisconsin, and placed under the care of Dr. H. A. Sincock, a specialist in diseases of children, gynecology and obstetrics, on August 26, 1953. X-rays were taken and the doctor found from physical examination Dr. Sincock testified as follows:
The doctor stated that the child's leg was placed in Bryant's vertical traction which consists of a type of adhesive tape. The tape is sticky on one side and the other side is a plain ordinary surface. A sheet wadding of cottony material is used as padding. One strip of tape is used on both sides and a small wooden block or spreader is placed inside the tape in position on the bottom of the foot. The spreader is used so that the tape does not stick to the ankle. The tape is placed so that the two sticky sides come together from the edge of the block down to where the cotton wadding is, so there would be no part of the tape that would stick to the ankle. Gauze was used over the tape so that it will adhere to the calf of the leg. From the ankle to the knee, on the top surface there is a space left at least one inch wide. On the back of the leg from the ankle to the knee a space of one inch wide is left so that in no place is the tape overlapping. That is where the bandage touches the skin. A rope is put through the end of the spreader and put over a pulley and weights are attached to the pulley to apply traction. This creates a direct pull to the leg. The leg is pulled straight up at a right angle to the bed rather than lengthwise to the body. Care must be given to the foot and the leg because it is necessary for the blood to be pumped high up into the air. Splints were applied above the knee. On August 30, 1953, the splints were adjusted. The hospital records indicate in Dr. Sincock's handwriting that he readjusted the splints because of pain and slight cyanosis of the foot (a bluish tinge in the color of skin) due to the presence of excessive amounts of reduced hemoglobin (reduced oxygen) in capillaries. Hospital records in Dr. Sincock's handwriting show that in a notation on August 27, indicated that 16 pounds were used on the leg, and further reads: 'Removed five pounds, so now there is 11 pound pull.' On August 30, the record indicates a decrease to nine pound pull and that the doctor readjusted the splint on account of pain and slight cyanosis of the foot. On September 1, 1953, there is a notation that toes were somewhat cyanotic and the splint was again readjusted. Dr. Sincock's own records for September 2, show On September 2, Dr. Picard looked at the leg and on September 3, Dr. Finn was called in for consultation. On September 4, 1953, Dr. Houkom was called from Duluth. His findings were: Fracture just above the knee with moderate overriding, in addition there was necrosis of the skin, particularly between the knee and the ankle joint and considerable swelling and bleb formation present. The diagnosis indicated:
The diagnosis and findings of Dr. Finn indicated: Dr. Sincock made a summary of the history that is included as part of the hospital records dated October 26, 1953, which read:
An operative record made by Dr. Houkom indicated The type of anesthetic used was ethel chloride. The operation was a Kirscher wire in the left tibia. The operation began at 8 a. m., in the morning. Was closed at 8:45 in the morning. What was done: Under general anesthesia a Kirschner wire was passed through the distal portion of the tibia above the epiphyseal plate. A Kirschner bow was then fastened to the wire. The leg suspended by vertical traction with enough weight to keep the left buttock off the bed. Signed, S. D. Houkom, and it says post-operative condition, hemorrhage, shock, etc. was satisfactory.'
Dr. Sincock on cross examination was asked:
'
* * *
' * * *
'
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fehrman v. Smirl
...588, 592, 214 N.W. 326, 215 N.W. 455. Cf. Vale v. Noe (1920), 172 Wis. 421, 179 N.W. 572. The appellant plaintiff in Ahola v. Sincock (1959), 6 Wis.2d 332, 94 N.W.2d 566, sought to have this court reverse its prior holding that res ipsa loquitur was inapplicable to medical malpractice cases......
-
Trogun v. Fruchtman
...effect. Order and judgment affirmed. 1 Jaeger v. Stratton (1920), 170 Wis. 579, 581, 176 N.W. 61, 62. See also: Ahola v. Sincock (1959), 6 Wis.2d 332, 348, 94 N.W.2d 566; Burnside v. Evangelical Deaconess Hospital (1970), 46 Wis.2d 519, 522, 175 N.W.2d 230.2 Hrubes v. Faber (1916), 163 Wis.......
-
Burnside v. Evangelical Deaconess Hospital
...due regard to the advanced state of medical science at the time, he has discharged his legal duty to his patient. Ahola v. Sincock (1959), 6 Wis.2d 332, 348, 94 N.W.2d 566; Kuehnemann v. Boyd (1927), 193 Wis. 588, 591, 214 N.W. 326, 215 N.W. 455; Jaeger v. Stratton (1920), 170 Wis. 579, 581......
-
McManus v. Donlin
...due regard to the advanced state of medical science at the time, he has discharged his legal duty to his patient. Ahola v. Sincock (1959), 6 Wis.2d 332, 348, 94 N.W.2d 566; Kuehnemann v. Boyd (1927), 193 Wis. 588, 591, 214 N.W. 326, 215 N.W. 455; Jaeger v. Stratton (1920), 170 Wis. 579, 581......