Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Ward
Citation | 69 So. 621,194 Ala. 242 |
Decision Date | 17 June 1915 |
Docket Number | 45 |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Parties | ALABAMA FUEL & IRON CO. v. WARD. |
Appeal from City Court of Birmingham; C.W. Ferguson, Judge.
Action by H. Ward against the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Transferred from the Court of Appeals of Alabama under section 6, Act April 18, 1911 (Gen.Acts 1911, p. 449).
The following counts of the complaint were submitted to the jury:
The following excerpts of the oral charge are pointed out by assignments of error 8:
The following charges were refused to defendant: (C) General affirmative charge; (F) affirmative charge as to the second count; (G) affirmative charge as to the first count.
Stokely, Scrivner & Dominick, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Burgin, Jenkins & Brown, of Birmingham, for appellee.
The suit was brought for alleged personal injuries received by appellee while in the employment of appellant.
Counts 5 and 6 were withdrawn. Appellant's demurrer to counts 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error.
The first and second assignments of error challenge the sufficiency of the complaint, for the failure to aver that when the plaintiff was injured he was in the discharge of his duties under his employment by the defendant. The averment was that:
"The p...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mackintosh Co. v. Wells
... ... 381, ... 100 So. 553, 33 A.L.R. 439), but was an invitee (Alabama ... By-Products Corp. v. Crosby [Ala.Sup.] 115 So. 31). If ... plaintiff ... Cook v. Sheffield ... Co., 206 Ala. 625, 91 So. 473; Ala. Fuel & Iron Co ... v. Ward, 194 Ala. 242, 251, 69 So. 621. The demurrers to ... ...
-
Walker County v. Davis
... ... S ... S. & I. Co. v. Stewart, 172 Ala. 516, 55 So. 785; ... Ala. Fuel & Iron Co. v. Ward, 194 Ala. 242, 69 So ... While ... in later ... ...
-
Clinton Mining Co. v. Bradford
... ... and scope of his employment with defendant. Ala. Fuel & ... Iron Co. v. Ward, 194 Ala. 242, 69 So. 621; St. L. & ... S.F.R ... ...
-
R. N. Baldwin v. J. H. Gaines
...does not afford the means of an intelligent estimate of the amount the assessment ought to include on this account. Alabama F. & I. Co. v. Ward, 194 Ala. 242, 69 So. 621; Diamond Rubber Co. v. Harryman, 41 415, 92 P. 922, 15 L.R.A. (N.S.) 775; Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. Harden, 156 Ala. ......