Alabama G.S.R. Co. v. Crocker

Decision Date28 November 1901
Citation131 Ala. 584,31 So. 561
PartiesALABAMA G. S. R. CO. v. CROCKER.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from law and equity court, Tuscaloosa county; J. J. Mayfield Judge.

Action by Robert Crocker, an infant, by his next friend, against the Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

This was an action brought by the appellee, Robert Crocker, a minor, by his next friend, against the Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint, as amended, contained three counts. In the first count the plaintiff sued for $2,000 as damages for that on February 6, 1898, the said Robert Crocker, being then "six years of age, went upon the turntable kept by the defendant at its depot and yards in the city of Tuscaloosa Alabama, and, while playing upon it with companions who were of like tender years, had his hip and back caught in or under the same, and badly mashed, lacerated, and bruised, to his damage as aforesaid; and plaintiff avers that the said turntable was attractive to children of tender years, who did not know its dangerous character, but that the same was dangerous for children to play upon, because it was easily turned, and, on account of its construction and great weight a person being upon it while it was turning was liable to be caught under the framework thereof, and crushed or otherwise injured; and plaintiff avers that said turntable was kept in a public, open place, where many people were constantly passing and repassing, and many children resorted to play and the defendant, well knowing these facts, carelessly and negligently left said turntable unlocked, uninclosed, or otherwise guarded, wherefore plaintiff sues." The second count of the complaint was as follows: "The plaintiff claims of the defendant the further sum of two thousand dollars as damages, for that heretofore, on, to wit, the 6th day of February, 1898, the defendant owned and kept a turntable at or near its depot in the city of Tuscaloosa, in an open and accessible place, where many children resorted to play, and the defendant, knowing or having reason to believe that children resorted to, or would resort to, its said turntable to play, and that it was a machine or structure dangerous for children to play on, negligently allowed or suffered the said turntable to remain unattended, uninclosed and unguarded, so that children could easily gain access to and move or turn the same, and on said day the plaintiff being a child of tender years, of the age of, to wit, 6 years, while playing on said turntable," received the injuries complained of. The third count of the complaint alleged that the defendant, at the time of the accident complained of, owned and kept a turntable near its depot in Tuscaloosa, in an open and accessible place, where children resorted to play, and "the defendant, well knowing that many children resorted there to play on its turntable, that said turntable was a dangerous structure or machine for children, and that several children had been in recent times past dangerously crushed, lacerated, and bruised by playing thereon, nevertheless negligently allowed said turntable to be and remain unfastened, uninclosed, and unguarded, so that children could easily gain access to and play upon and turn the same." This count of the complaint then averred that the plaintiff, being a child of tender years, was injured while playing on said turntable in the manner averred in the other counts of the complaint, and then averred as follows: "That said injury was caused by the negligence of the defendant in leaving said turntable unfastened and unguarded, although it knew that many children resorted there to play upon the same, that it was a dangerous structure or machine for children to play on, and that several children, by reason of playing thereon, had been...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Blackwell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 23, 1918
    ... ... been often reaffirmed by this court. A.G.S. Ry. Co. v ... Crocker, 131 Ala. 584, 31 So. 561; Athey v. T.C., I ... & R.R. Co., 191 Ala. 646, 649, 68 So. 154; Clover ... from Decherd, Tenn., to Hobbs Island, Ala., through the city ... of Huntsville, in Alabama, for the purpose of carrying ... freight and passengers for hire as a common carrier, and in ... ...
  • Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co. of Ind.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1950
    ...operate to require care for persons who may be at the place of danger without right. ' (My italics.) Alabama G. S. R. Co. v. Crocker, 1901, 131 Ala. 584, 590, 31 So. 561, 563. quoted with approval in Chicago & E. R. Co. v. Fox, 1901, 38 Ind.App. 268, 278, 70 N.E. 81, supra, and Drew v. Lett......
  • Stark v. Holtzclaw
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 25, 1925
    ... ... care for persons who may be at the place of danger without ... right.' Alabama G. S. R. Co. v. Crocker, 131 ... Ala. 584, 31 So. 561 ... The ... tree in this case, ... ...
  • City of Shawnee v. Cheek
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1913
    ...court. * * * It must be admitted that a majority of the cases adopt the rule of the Stout case. The list includes Alabama G. S. R. Co. v. Crocker, 131 Ala. 584, 31 So. 561; Barrett v. Southern P. Co., 91 Cal. 296, 27 P. 666, 25 Am. St. Rep. 186; Ferguson v. Columbus, etc., R. Co., 77 Ga. 10......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT