Alabama v. United States
Decision Date | 22 October 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 324,324 |
Citation | 83 S.Ct. 145,371 U.S. 37,9 L.Ed.2d 112 |
Parties | ALABAMA et al. v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston, Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58, 80 S.Ct. 612, 4 L.Ed.2d 535.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cornelius v. Benevolent Protective Order of Elks
...relief sought might well be appropriate. Cf., State of Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), aff'd, 371 U.S. 37, 83 S.Ct. 145, 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962). Absent some element of bad faith in their administration of State tax laws, the defendant State officials are clearly not liable ......
-
Brown v. BOARD OF SCH. COM'RS OF MOBILE CTY., ALA., Civ. A. No. 75-298-P.
...Ala.1961) (Alabama voting provisions discussed; Macon County), aff'd, 304 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1962), aff'd per curiam, 371 U.S. 37, 83 S.Ct. 145, 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962), see also United States v. Mayton, 335 F.2d 153 (5th Cir. 1964) (Perry County); United States v. Atkins, 323 F.2d 733 (5th Ci......
-
Dobbins v. Local 212, International Bro. of Elec. Wkrs.
...member. That is one extreme. As the Fifth Circuit said in State of Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583 (1962, affirmed 371 U.S. 37, 83 S.Ct. 145, 9 L.Ed.2d 112): "In the problem of racial discrimination, statistics often tell much, and courts Compare the statistical recitations in Monroe......
-
United States v. Manning
...rather than simply prohibiting racial discrimination, see Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 304 F.2d 583, aff'd, 1962, 371 U.S. 37, 83 S.Ct. 145, 9 L.Ed.2d 112. 41 For other types of cases where the court, after judgment, has added defendants and granted supplemental relief to make it......
-
Deposing & examining the expert statistician
...“…statistics often tell much and the courts listen.” Alabama v. United States , 304 F.2d 583, 586 (5th Cir. 1962), aff’d per curiam , 371 U.S. 37, 83 S. Ct 145, 9 L. Ed. 2d 112 (1962). PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF CHAPTER Over the past thirty years, victims of discrimination have used workforce sta......
-
CHAPTER 4 LOCAL LAND USE REGULATION OF EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES: EVOLVING JUDICIAL AND REGULATORY APPROACHES
...1993). [31] Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 57 Cal.2d 515, 20 Cal.Rptr. 638, 370 P.2d 342, app. dism'd., 371 U.S. 37 (1962). [32] 370 P.2d at 344. [33] Besides Ex Parte Kelso, Note 10 supra, the other cases were People v. Hawley, 207 Cal. 395, 279 P. 136 (1929); In re......
-
Just who is an applicant?: The impact of electronic resumes and job search engines on employment discrimination law.
...Cir. 1975). (95.) LARSON, supra note 77, at [section] 22.01. (96.) Alabama v. U.S., 304 F.2d 583, 586 (5th Cir. 1962), aff'd per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 (97.) Id. (98.) Harper, 525 F.2d at 412. It is rationale to assume that a rule prohibiting employment of spouses would fall more heavily upon ......