Aladdin Oil Burner Corporation v. Morton
| Decision Date | 09 October 1936 |
| Docket Number | No. 433.,433. |
| Citation | 187 A. 350,117 N.J.L. 260 |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Parties | ALADDIN OIL BURNER CORPORATION, A BODY CORPORATE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM J. MORTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT |
Appeal from District Court of Newark.
Action by the Aladdin Oil Burner Corporation against William J. Morton.From an adverse judgment, the plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remitted for further proceeding in accordance with opinion.
Argued May term, 1936, before BODINE and HEHER, JJ.
Harry Levin, of Newark, for appellant.Milton M. Unger, of Newark, for respondent.
Plaintiff sued to recover the price of an oil burner sold and delivered to defendant under a contract which conditioned defendant's liability for the purchase price upon a "reasonable satisfaction" with the equipment.The latter disaffirmed under this clause.The district court judge, sitting without a jury, rendered...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Lee v. State
...be totally denied. In civil nonjury cases, the right may be waived. Id. at 101 (footnotes omitted). See also Aladdin Oil Burner Corp. v. Morton, 117 N.J.L. 260, 187 A. 350 (1936), a contract case in which the trial court's denial of the right of final argument was considered to be an arbitr......
-
Clark Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Tice
...the district court's refusal to allow an opening argument to the jury constitutes reversible error, citing Aladdin Oil Burner Corp. v. Morton, 1936, 117 N.J. L. 260, 187 A. 350; Conner v. Flaska, 1927, 32 N.M. 162, 252 P. 1001, and Stolpher v. Bowen Motor Coaches, Tex. Civ.App.1945, 190 S.W......
-
State v. Vigilante
...that it should never be denied. Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 95 S.Ct. 2550, 45 L.Ed.2d 593 supra; Aladdin Oil Burner Corp. v. Morton, 117 N.J.L. 260, 187 A. 350 (E. & A.1936). Research has disclosed no New Jersey authority which either condones or permits a criminal defendant to waive......
-
Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc.
...jury in summation as to this issue is without merit. Its counsel was not deprived of a closing. Therefore, Aladdin Oil Burner Corp. v. Morton, 117 N.J.L. 260, 187 A. 350 (Sup.Ct.1936), on which it relies, is inapposite. In his summation Ava's counsel spent considerable time discussing the m......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Section 13.4 Right to Argue
...the supervision and control of the trial court. 75A Am. Jur. 2d Trial § 544, pp. 121–22, p. 294 (1991); Aladdin Oil Burner Corp. v. Morton, 187 A. 350 (N.J. 1936); City of Seattle v. Erickson, 104 P. 1128 (Wash. 1909). In Warner v. Close, 96 S.W. 491, 491–92 (Mo. App. W.D. 1906), the court ......