Alan J. Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
Writing for the CourtHANDLER
Citation708 A.2d 401,153 N.J. 218
PartiesALAN J. CORNBLATT, P.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Aileen BAROW, Defendant-Appellant.
Decision Date19 March 1998

Page 218

153 N.J. 218
708 A.2d 401
ALAN J. CORNBLATT, P.A., Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Aileen BAROW, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued Nov. 3, 1997.
Decided March 19, 1998.

Hilton L. Stein, Montville, for defendant-appellant (Mr. Stein and Wilbert & Montenegro, Brick Town, attorneys; Mr. Stein and Diane M. Acciavatti, Randolph, on the briefs).

Mark H. Sobel, Woodbridge, for plaintiff-respondent (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, attorneys; Richard L. Hertzberg, Iselin, on the brief).

Abbott S. Brown, South Orange, for amici curiae the New Jersey State Bar Association, The Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey and the Trial Attorneys of New Jersey (Brown & Gold, attorneys; Mr. Brown and William L. Gold, on the brief).

Page 224

Christopher J. Carey, Newark, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld (Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld, attorneys; Mr. Carey, Marianne M. DeMarco and Carol G. D'Alessandro, on the brief).

John F. Kearney, III, Moorestown, on behalf of amicus curiae the Burlington County Bar Association, relied upon the brief submitted by amici curiae The New Jersey State Bar Association, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey and the Trial Attorneys of New Jersey.

Robert B. Hille, Hackensack, on behalf of amicus curiae The Bergen County Bar Association, relied upon the brief submitted by amici curiae The New Jersey State Bar Association, The Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey and The Trial Attorneys of New Jersey (Contant, Scherby & Atkins, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HANDLER, J.

In 1995, the Legislature enacted a statute, the Affidavit of Merit Bill, that imposed requirements[708 A.2d 404] for initiating and maintaining certain professional malpractice actions. L. 1995, c. 139 (codified at N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26 to -29). The statute by its terms applies to "causes of action which occur" on or after the effective date of enactment. A key provision of the statute requires the submission of an affidavit of merit within sixty days of the filing of the answer to the complaint. This case presents important issues concerning the application of the statute. These include the scope of the requirements of the affidavit of merit, whether a dismissal for failure to comply with those requirements is with prejudice, and whether the statute applies to cases filed on or after its effective date when the underlying facts constituting the alleged malpractice have occurred prior thereto.

I

In November 1989, defendant Aileen Barow retained plaintiff Alan Cornblatt, an attorney, to represent her in a divorce action.

Page 225

Barow claims that Cornblatt portrayed himself as completely competent in matrimonial matters, especially in the settlement of cases. Barow alleges that in the course of that representation Cornblatt required her to deal with one of his associates rather than with Cornblatt. Eventually, Barow grew frustrated with having his case handled by an associate and she confronted Cornblatt about it. She became "disillusioned" with Cornblatt when he allegedly told her that, contrary to his earlier representations, he really was better equipped to try rather than to settle matrimonial cases.

Barow's matrimonial case turned out to be very complex and ultimately required a lengthy trial. At the conclusion of the case Cornblatt billed Barow $218,004.47 for his services. Barow elected to submit the fee to the District Fee Arbitration Committee (Committee). R. 1:20A-1 to -6. Barow retained attorney Michele Donato to represent her during the fee dispute. On September 14, 1995, after a three day hearing on the matter, the Committee found that Cornblatt engaged in duplication of billing in the amount of $5,475.25 and reduced the bill by that amount.

Barow had previously paid $40,817.60, so the remaining amount she owed Cornblatt was $171,711.62. Barow subsequently appealed the Committee's decision to the Disciplinary Review Board on December 13, 1995; the Board dismissed the appeal on April 16, 1996.

On November 13, 1995, when Barow had not paid the fee within thirty days, Cornblatt filed a complaint in the Law Division against Barow to recover the amount owed. Barow filed her answer on January 3, 1996. The answer included a counterclaim alleging that Cornblatt breached his contract with her by failing to carry out his duties and render services in a reasonable manner. Specifically, Barow claimed that Cornblatt negligently delayed the case, did not settle the matter, thereby forcing a trial, and charged an excessive fee by prolonging his representation. Cornblatt filed

Page 226

his answer to the counterclaim on February 5, 1996. In his answer, Cornblatt demanded that Barow submit an affidavit of merit within sixty days as required by the Affidavit of Merit Bill. N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27. Subsequently, on February 13, 1996, the trial court entered a Differentiated Case Management Scheduling Order, specifically requiring Barow to produce an expert affidavit by April 5, 1996.

Defendant Barow did not comply, and on April 24, 1996, plaintiff moved to dismiss defendant's counterclaim. Because the Disciplinary Review Board had by then dismissed defendant's appeal of the arbitration award, plaintiff also moved for summary judgment on his complaint for his fee. On May 1, 1996, defendant cross-moved for an extension of the expert affidavit filing period pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, which provides for an extension of the sixty day period "upon a finding of good cause." Alternatively, defendant claimed the statute did not apply to her case because her claim was for breach of contract rather than for damages resulting from personal injury. The trial court denied the cross-motion.

On May 8, 1996, the trial court dismissed defendant's counterclaim with prejudice on the ground that defendant failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of the statute. [708 A.2d 405] Thereafter, the trial court decided to reconsider its rulings.

Defendant submitted a certification by Michele Donato dated May 16, 1996, stating that Cornblatt's performance during his representation of Barow was negligent. Defendant also submitted a certification stating that she had experienced difficulty obtaining an expert to submit the affidavit. Defendant later submitted another certification from Donato stating that Donato had no financial interest in the outcome of the case.

On June 7, 1996, the trial court dismissed the counterclaim. It ruled that even though the court considered the certification as timely filed, the statute required an affidavit. 1 Further, the court

Page 227

found the substance of the certification to be deficient because the certifying expert did not state that Cornblatt had breached any standard of care, did not state that she had expertise in the area, and did not state that she had no financial interest in the matter.

Thereafter, in a written opinion dated July 30, 1996, the court dismissed Barow's counterclaim and entered summary judgment for Cornblatt on the fee claim. The court based the dismissal on the deficiencies in the certification and ruled that the dismissal was with prejudice because of the entire controversy doctrine. It also entered summary judgment for Cornblatt on the fee dispute based on the final arbitration decision by the Disciplinary Review Board.

Barow appealed the trial court's ruling only with respect to the dismissal of her counterclaim.

The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court, holding that the statute encompassed legal malpractice claims against attorneys, the certification in place of an affidavit did not satisfy the statute, the contents of the certification were deficient, and the dismissal with prejudice was appropriate. 303 N.J.Super. 81, 696 A.2d 65 (1997). In dicta, the court also concluded that the statute applies to all actions filed on or after the effective date of the statute regardless of when the underlying facts giving rise to the claims occurred. Id. at 92, 696 A.2d 65.

Barow petitioned this Court for certification. As amici curiae, the New Jersey State Bar Association, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey, and the Trial Attorneys of New Jersey (collectively, Bar Associations) urged the Court to stay all summary judgment motions based on the Appellate Division's opinion pending the Court's resolution of the matter. On September 16, 1997, the Court entered a stay of the Appellate Division's

Page 228

judgment pending resolution of the case. We granted certification on September 25, 1997. 151 N.J. 470, 700 A.2d 882.
II

On June 29, 1995, Governor Whitman signed into law a package of five tort reform bills to "bring common sense and equity to the state's civil litigation system." Office of the Governor, News Release 1 (June 29, 1995). The package included the Joint-And-Several Liability Bill, L. 1995, c. 140 (amending N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.2, -5.3); the Retail-Sellers' Liability Bill, L. 1995, c. 141 (codified at N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-8 to -9); the Punitive Damages Act, L. 1995, c. 142 (codified at N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.9 to -5.17); the Health-Care Providers' Liability Bill, L. 1995, c. 143 (codified at N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-10 to -11); and, the subject of this action, the Affidavit of Merit Bill, L. 1995, c. 139 (codified at N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26 to -29).

The Affidavit of Merit Bill defines "licensed person" to mean "any person who is licensed as: ... c. an attorney admitted to practice law in New Jersey." N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26. The statute, as determined by the lower courts, clearly applies to attorney legal malpractice.

The statute contains several provisions defining the scope of the requirements for the [708 A.2d 406] submission of an affidavit of merit. These state:

Affidavit required in certain actions against licensed persons

In any action for damages for personal injuries, wrongful death or property damage resulting from an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
132 practice notes
  • Waterloov Gutter Protection v. Absolute Gutter, Civil Action No. 97-2554.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • September 28, 1999
    ...legally significant facts occurred after the effective date of the statute, June 29, 1995. See Alan J. Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 229, 236, 708 A.2d 401, 406, 410 (1998). The facts critical to determining malpractice in this case occurred in April 1994 when Knight decided to in......
  • Lomando v. United States , No. 11–1957.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • December 30, 2011
    ...goal must be to determine the Legislature's intent.” Frugis, 827 A.2d at 1058 (quoting [667 F.3d 386] Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 708 A.2d 401, 407 (1998)); see also DiProspero, 874 A.2d at 1048 (“The Legislature's intent is the paramount goal when interpreting a statute.”). N.J......
  • Nuveen Mun. Trust ex rel. Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund v. Withumsmith Brown, P.C., No. 10–4633.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • August 16, 2012
    ...Jersey intermediate state court decisions—Cornblatt v. Barow, 303 N.J.Super. 81, 696 A.2d 65, 68 (App.Div.1997), rev'd on other grounds,153 N.J. 218, 708 A.2d 401 (1998), and Nagim v. New Jersey Transit, 369 N.J.Super. 103, 848 A.2d 61, 70 (Law Div.2003)—for their statements that a claim ag......
  • In re NJ Affordable Homes Corp., Case No.: 05-60442 (DHS)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • November 8, 2013
    ...language is the best indicator of legislative intent. See Sasco 1997 Ni, 166 N.J. at 586 (quoting Alan J. Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 231 (N.J. 1998) (internal citation omitted)); Med. Soc. of N.J. v. N.J. Dep't of Law & Public Safety, Div. of Consumer Affairs, State Bd. of Phys......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
133 cases
  • Waterloov Gutter Protection v. Absolute Gutter, Civil Action No. 97-2554.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • September 28, 1999
    ...legally significant facts occurred after the effective date of the statute, June 29, 1995. See Alan J. Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 229, 236, 708 A.2d 401, 406, 410 (1998). The facts critical to determining malpractice in this case occurred in April 1994 when Knight decided to in......
  • Lomando v. United States , No. 11–1957.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • December 30, 2011
    ...goal must be to determine the Legislature's intent.” Frugis, 827 A.2d at 1058 (quoting [667 F.3d 386] Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 708 A.2d 401, 407 (1998)); see also DiProspero, 874 A.2d at 1048 (“The Legislature's intent is the paramount goal when interpreting a statute.”). N.J......
  • Nuveen Mun. Trust ex rel. Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund v. Withumsmith Brown, P.C., No. 10–4633.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • August 16, 2012
    ...Jersey intermediate state court decisions—Cornblatt v. Barow, 303 N.J.Super. 81, 696 A.2d 65, 68 (App.Div.1997), rev'd on other grounds,153 N.J. 218, 708 A.2d 401 (1998), and Nagim v. New Jersey Transit, 369 N.J.Super. 103, 848 A.2d 61, 70 (Law Div.2003)—for their statements that a claim ag......
  • In re NJ Affordable Homes Corp., Case No.: 05-60442 (DHS)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • November 8, 2013
    ...language is the best indicator of legislative intent. See Sasco 1997 Ni, 166 N.J. at 586 (quoting Alan J. Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 231 (N.J. 1998) (internal citation omitted)); Med. Soc. of N.J. v. N.J. Dep't of Law & Public Safety, Div. of Consumer Affairs, State Bd. of Phys......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT