Alaska Native Ass'n of Oregon v. Morton
Decision Date | 23 December 1974 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 2133-73,2141-73. |
Citation | 417 F. Supp. 459 |
Parties | ALASKA NATIVE ASSOCIATION OF OREGON et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rogers C. B. MORTON et al., Defendants. ALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES, INTERNATIONAL et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rogers C. B. MORTON et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia |
A. John Wabaunsee, Boulder, Colo., admitted pro hac vice, for ANAO.
A. Raymond Randolph, Jr., Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Washington, D. C., for AFNI.
Herbert Pittle, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant Morton.
Kenneth C. Bass, III, Washington, D. C., for intervenor defendant Alaska Federation of Natives in No. 2141-73.
Stephen M. Truitt, Washington, D. C., for intervenor defendant Aleut Corporation in No. 2141-73.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. It involves the construction of Section 7(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 85 Stat. 688 et seq. (1971), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1624, which provides for an election to determine whether a thirteenth region for non-resident Alaska Natives shall be established, and it involves the procedures of the Department of the Interior in carrying out the election.
Plaintiffs are two organizations for Alaska Natives residing in States other than Alaska: the Alaska Native Association of Oregon (ANAO) and the Alaska Federation of Natives, International (AFNI), and ten non-resident Alaska Natives. Defendants are the Secretary of the Department of the Interior and its agencies which are responsible for the implementation of the Act, and two intervenor defendants, the Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN), an organization which represents ten of the twelve Alaska regional corporations, and the Aleut Corporation, one of the twelve regional corporations.
In order to put the two legal issues before the Court in perspective, it is first necessary to review the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (the Act), especially that portion dealing with an election to determine whether a thirteenth region for non-resident Alaska Natives shall be established, and then describe the history of the election process.
The purpose of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act is to meet the "immediate need for a fair and just settlement of all claims by Natives and Native groups of Alaska, based on aboriginal land claims."1 "`Native' means a citizen of the United States who is a person of one-fourth degree or more Alaska Indian . . .."2 The Act declares that all such claims are extinguished3 and, as part of the legislative settlement, establishes an Alaska Native Fund (the Fund), which consists of $962,400,000 to be distributed to the Natives as part of the compensation for their claims.4
Pursuant to the Act, the State of Alaska was divided into twelve geographic regions "with each region composed as far as practicable of Natives having a common heritage and sharing common interests."5 Regional Corporations for each of these twelve regions were thereafter established.6 Each region was further subdivided into villages, and Village Corporations were established.7 The Regional Corporations are the conduits through which the monies from the Fund are distributed to the Village Corporations and to the Natives who are stockholders of the corporations.8
For the purpose of enrolling Natives in the various regions, the Act directed the Secretary of the Interior to prepare a roll of all living Alaska Natives by December 18, 1973.9 The roll was to show where each Native resided on the date of the 1970 census enumeration, and, if the Native was a permanent resident of Alaska, he was to be enrolled in the corresponding region in Alaska.10
Therefore a non-resident Native might elect to be enrolled in one of the twelve Alaska regions or in a thirteenth region for non-resident Natives.12 The thirteenth region, if established, would consist only of those non-resident Natives who had voted in favor of a thirteenth region.13 If a thirteenth region were not established by a majority vote, each non-resident Native, regardless of his vote, would then be enrolled in one of the twelve Alaska regions14 as one of "the class of stockholders who are not residents of . . . villages."15
It is the opinion of the plaintiffs, who are seeking the establishment of a thirteenth region, that non-resident Natives would receive more money in dividends through a thirteenth regional corporation, even though such a corporation's income would be limited to the Fund, because money distributed through the twelve Regional Corporations would be deflected from the stockholders to projects to benefit the local region. Obviously, non-resident Natives would not benefit from such local projects.
The defendants think that the additional income from the regions' resource development would more than compensate for any funding of local projects out of the Fund so that non-resident Natives would receive more money in dividends by belonging to one of the twelve Regional Corporations. The Court expresses no opinion as to which would be of greater financial benefit to non-resident Natives.
On March 17, 1972, the Secretary of the Interior issued regulations for the enrollment of Alaska Natives. Applications provided by the Bureau of Indian Affairs were to be completed by all Natives and submitted to the Coordinating Office in Anchorage, Alaska, by March 30, 1973.21
The regulations also provided as follows:22
Enumerators were dispersed throughout Alaska to assist resident Natives in filling out the enrollment application. In the process of enrolling resident Natives, the enumerators discovered the names and addresses of Natives living outside of Alaska, and they mailed enrollment applications to them. Applications were also made available at all Area Offices of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. A public relations firm was retained to handle a media campaign designed to inform Natives living outside of Alaska about the Act. But non-resident Natives experienced difficulty in completing the application with only the assistance of the accompanying instruction sheets. Organizations of non-resident Natives sought the appointment of enumerators to assist Natives residing outside of Alaska. In Mid-February, 1973, just six weeks before the deadline for filing applications, nineteen Native enumerators were hired to serve Natives living outside of Alaska.
Non-resident Natives who procured enrollment forms received a packet containing a notice, an instruction sheet, and an application.
The notice advised the recipient:23
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Walker v. LaRose
...of issues and thus impede or totally obstruct vital governmental processes and interests." Id. Accord Alaska Native Assn. of Oregon v. Morton , 417 F.Supp. 459, 467-468 (D.D.C.1974) (interpreting "a majority of all eligible Natives" as used in a federal statute to mean a majority of those w......
-
Ada v. Government of Guam
...decisions is too firmly established to be further questioned in this state." Id. at 188. 11 For example, in Alaska Native Ass'n of Oregon v. Morton, 417 F.Supp. 459 (D.D.C. 1974), the court noted that "a majority is determined on the basis of those voting on the particular proposition on th......
-
State ex rel. Walker v. LaRose
...and thus impede or totally obstruct vital governmental processes and interests." Id. Accord Alaska Native Assn. of Oregon v. Morton, 417 F.Supp. 459, 467-468 (D.D.C.1974) (interpreting "a majority of all eligible Natives" as used in a federal statute to mean a majority of those who voted on......