Alaska Packers Ass v. Industrial Accident Commission State California, 266
| Decision Date | 09 April 1928 |
| Docket Number | No. 266,266 |
| Citation | 276 U.S. 467,48 S.Ct. 346,72 L.Ed. 656 |
| Parties | ALASKA PACKERS' ASS'N v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION of STATE of CALIFORNIA et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Blair S. Shuman and Allen L. Chickering, both of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Messrs. G. C. Faulkner, and H. W. Hutton, both of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents.
While standing on the land in Alaska respondent Peterson endeavored to push into navigable water a standed boat, 26 feet long, theretofore used by him and another for taking fish, and while so engaged sustained bodily injuries. The fishing season had ended, the nets had been removed, and the boat, partly in the water, was resting on the sand. The immediate purpose was to float it to the dock nearby in order that it might be lifted thereon and stored for the winter, according to the ordinary practice.
Petitioner is a California corporation engaged in the business of taking flsh in Alaska and canning them at its factory located in that territory. Peterson resided in California. Within that state he entered into a contract with the association whereby he agreed to go to Alaska as a seaman on its bark Star of Iceland, and after arriving at the cannery to go ashore and act there as directed-'anything I was told to do.' Among other things, he made nets, fixed up the small boats always kept there, took them out, and served as a flsherman on one of them.
The Industrial Accident Commission of California, purporting to act under the laws of that state, made an award against the petitioner and in favor of Peterson, and this was affirmed by the Supreme Court. The judgment is challenged here upon the sole ground that when injured he was doing maritime work under a maritime contract, and that the rights and liabilities of the parties must be determined by applying the general rules of maritime law, and not otherwise. Union Fish Co. v. Erickson, 248 U. S. 308, 39 S. Ct. 112, 63 L. Ed. 261; Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205, 37 S. Ct. 524, 61 L. Ed. 1086, L. R. A. 1918C, 451, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 900, and similar cases, are relied upon.
Whether in any possible view the circumstances disclose a cause within the admiralty jurisdiction, we need not stop to determine. Even if an affirmative answer be assumed, the petitioner must fail. Peterson was not employed merely to work on the bark or the fishing boat. He also undertook to perform...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garrisey v. Westshore Marina Associates
...Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co., 370 U.S. 114, 82 S.Ct. 1196, 8 L.Ed.2d 368 (1962); Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission, 276 U.S. 467, 48 S.Ct. 346, 72 L.Ed. 656 (1928). There are many cases dealing expressly or in effect with the 'local concern' doctrine which recogni......
-
Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Washington
...statute. Cf. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud, 270 U.S. 59, 46 S.Ct. 194, 70 L.Ed. 470; Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Comm., 276 U.S. 467, 48 S.Ct. 346, 72 L.Ed. 656. That is the practical result, whether it be reached by the Court's path or that apparently left open ......
-
McClain v. Kansas City Bridge Co.
... ... want of jurisdiction under State law. Sec. 3310 (a), R. S ... 1929; Sec. 2, Art ... Braud, 270 ... U.S. 59; Alaska Packers Assn. v. Accident Comm., 276 ... U.S ... Commission is wrong and is against the weight of the ... Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co., 266 U.S. 171, 45 S.Ct. 39; ... Robins Dry Dock Co ... ...
-
Hahn v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel Co.
...Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud, 270 U.S. 59, 46 S.Ct. 194, 70 L.Ed. 470; Alaska Packers Association v. Industrial Accident Commission, (April 9, 1928), 276 U.S. 467, 48 S.Ct. 346, 72 L.Ed. 656.' Otherwise, the federal Act afforded the exclusive remedy, as provided in 33 U.S.C.A. §......