Alaska SS Co. v. United States, 6842.
Decision Date | 13 February 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 6842.,6842. |
Citation | 63 F.2d 398 |
Parties | ALASKA S. S. CO. v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Lawrence Bogle, Cassius E. Gates, Norman M. Littell, and Bogle, Bogle & Gates, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., and Jeffrey Heiman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
This action was brought in the District Court by appellant to recover the cost of transporting from Ketchikan, Alaska, to Seattle, Wash., the crew of the steamship Depere, owned and operated by appellant, which vessel, on November 15, 1929, while en route from Seattle to Ketchikan, was wrecked near Port McArthur, Alaska, where the crew went ashore. The following day, November 16, in response to radio messages from the Depere at the time of the wreck, a United States Coast Guard boat transported the crew of the Depere to Ketchikan, Alaska, where they were landed on November 17, 1929. The United States Deputy Collector of Customs at Ketchikan took charge of the crew of the Depere as destitute seamen and provided them with lodging and sustenance, as required by sections 678 and 679 of title 46, USCA, which are as follows:
November 20, 1929, the deputy collector of customs issued a shipwrecked seamen's certificate addressed to the master of the steamship Yukon, also owned and operated by appellant, requiring the master of the Yukon to transport the crew of the Depere to the port of Seattle, Wash., and agreeing to compensate appellant for such transportation in a certain amount. The United States deputy collector of customs at Seattle certified to the arrival of the crew of the Depere via the Yukon on November 22, 1929.
Appellant then applied to the Comptroller General of the United States for the compensation stipulated in the shipwrecked seamen's certificate. This claim was rejected on the ground that: "The duty of relieving and transporting the crew of shipwrecked vessels is primarily that of the owner or operator and where this duty has been undertaken the appropriation for the `Relief and Protection of American Seamen' is not available to reimburse the owner or operator for the expense incurred in performing such duty."
This action was then brought to recover said sum, and it was alleged: "That the aforesaid action of the Comptroller General of the United States in refusing to pay the claim of the plaintiff as set forth herein constitutes an arbitrary and wrongful act; that the aforesaid ruling of the Comptroller General represented by the above-quoted letter is an arbitrary and unlawful construction and interpretation of the above-cited statutes 46 USCA §§ 678, 679 and that such construction and interpretation placed upon the said statutes by the Comptroller General is arbitrary and illegal in the following respects, to wit: It violates and contravenes the statutes of the United States expressly allowing compensation to ship-owners transporting shipwrecked seamen to the United States, and making it the duty of the consular officers and commercial agents of the United States, and not of the owners of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Indemnity Co. v. Detroit Fidelity & S. Co.
... ... American Indemnity Company instituted against the sureties in the United States court of the district in Texas in which it was domiciled. Each of ... ...
-
American Scantic Line v. United States
...case in which that policy appears to have been questioned is Alaska Steamship Co. v. United States, D.C., 60 F.2d 135, affirmed, 9 Cir., 63 F.2d 398, and reversed in the United States Supreme Court, 290 U.S. 256, 54 S.Ct. 159, 78 L.Ed. 302, decided Dec. 4, In that case the Deputy Collector ......