ALBANESE v. PIERCE
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Justia & Oyez |
| Citation | 355 U.S. 15 |
| Decision Date | 14 October 1957 |
ALBANESE v. PIERCE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 247.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 144 Conn. 241, 129 A. 2d 606.
Charles A. Horsky and J. Warren Upson for appellant.
David Goldstein for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
To continue reading
Request your trial
69 practice notes
-
Hammer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., Nos. 8841
...and addressing subordinate facts rather than ultimate facts. See Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 261, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). For example, one interrogatory asks, "Do you find from the evidence that the piercing was distal or beyond ......
-
State v. Copas, (SC 15759)
...Corp. v. Quinn, 241 Conn. 630, 641, 698 A.2d 258 (1997); accord Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S. Ct. 36, 2 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1957). Thus, in determining whether the evidence supports a particular inference, we ask whether that inference ......
-
Slicer v. Quigley
...v. Morelli, 154 Conn. 432, 226 A.2d 383 (1967). See also Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 249, 129 A.2d 606 (1957), appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957); London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Duryea, 143 Conn. 53, 59-60, 119 A.2d 325 (1955). "At common law it was......
-
Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.
...requirements of due process and equal protection." Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 249, 129 A.2d 606, 612, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). The constitutional issue is whether legislative classifications or discriminations bear "a rational relationship to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
68 cases
-
State v. Little
...peculiarly a jury function, the raison d'etre of the jury system." Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957); see also State v. Tatem, 194 Conn. 594, 483 A.2d 1087 (1984). It is within the province of the trier of f......
-
Hammer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., Nos. 8841
...and addressing subordinate facts rather than ultimate facts. See Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 261, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). For example, one interrogatory asks, "Do you find from the evidence that the piercing was distal or beyond ......
-
State v. Copas, (SC 15759)
...Corp. v. Quinn, 241 Conn. 630, 641, 698 A.2d 258 (1997); accord Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S. Ct. 36, 2 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1957). Thus, in determining whether the evidence supports a particular inference, we ask whether that inference ......
-
Slicer v. Quigley
...v. Morelli, 154 Conn. 432, 226 A.2d 383 (1967). See also Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 249, 129 A.2d 606 (1957), appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957); London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Duryea, 143 Conn. 53, 59-60, 119 A.2d 325 (1955). "At common law it was......
Request a trial to view additional results