Alberta Contracting Corp. v. Santomassimo
| Decision Date | 21 June 1930 |
| Docket Number | No. 208.,208. |
| Citation | 150 A. 830 |
| Parties | ALBERTA CONTRACTING CORPORATION v. SANTOMASSIMO, Acting Vice Consul of Italy. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The relation of employer and employee continues while the employee is riding to and from his employer's premises, in a truck used in connection with his employer's work, by direction of his employer, with his knowledge and acquiescence in the continued practice, which was beneficial to both the employer and employee; and an injury sustained while so riding arises out of and in the course of his employment.
Certiorari by the Alberta Contracting Corporation against Francesco Santomassimo, as acting vice consul of Italy, intervening on behalf of Filomena Vespa and another, for the purpose of setting aside a judgment affirming an award by the Workmen's Compensation Board on account of an injury to a workman resulting in death.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued January term, 1930, before TRENCHARD, LLOYD, and CASE, JJ.
Frank G. Turner, of Newark, for prosecutor.
Whiting & Moore, of Newark (Ira C. Moore, Jr., of Newark, of counsel), for defendant.
The Alberta Contracting Corporation, the prosecutor of this writ, seeks to set aside the judgment of the Essex county court of common pleas affirming an award by the Workmen's Compensation Bureau to the petitioner on account of an injury to a workman resulting in death.
The material facts are not in dispute. Substantially they are as follows: Giuseppe Vespa, the decedent, was employed by the Alberta Contracting Corporation, as a laborer at its stone quarry, at a place known as Beech Glen, "in the woods," thirteen miles from, Boonton. Decedent's work was to dig rock from the stone quarry and prepare it for the crusher. The employer used a number of trucks in hauling stone and rock; some of these trucks were owned by the employer, and some were not, but all were used in hauling stone in connection with the employer's wort;. There was no railroad or bus line running to Beech Glen from Boonton, where the laborers, including the decedent, lived. The trucks, however, passed from Boonton to Beech Glen every morning and came back at night, and it was the custom of the laborers, including the decedent, to go to work on one of these trucks and return on one at night. The testimony does not disclose an express agreement between the decedent and the employer that he should adopt this mode of transportation to and from the work. It does show, however, that this was the only way of going to and from the work, that the men were ordered from time to time by the "boss" to take the last truck home, and that for sixteen months they continued to go to and from work in this way with the knowledge and acquiescence of the employer.
The witness Nicholas Grieco, a fellow laborer with the decedent, testified in part as follows:
The witness further testified as follows:
On August 13, 1924, Giuseppe Vespa, the decedent, as was his custom, stopped the first truck going toward Beech Glen and got on it to go to work; he was accompanied by the witness Nicholas Grieco. After they had gone a short distance, the truck was stopped by one Mike Sigereto, the brother of the president of the Alberta Contracting Company, who was also employed by that company as foreman. Mike Sigereto was deaf and dumb. He signaled to Vespa to get up and let him have his seat, which Vespa did, Vespa taking a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Spencer Kellogg & Sons
...theretofore. This appears to be the construction placed upon the statute by the New Jersey courts themselves. Alberta Contracting Co. v. Santomassimo (N. J. Sup.) 150 A. 830. The opposite is concededly true of those who for the first time boarded the launch on Monday morning in search of wo......
-
The Linseed King Spencer Kellogg Sons v. Hicks Alexander v. Spencer Kellogg Sons
...employer and employee exists during such transportation. Depue v. Salmon Co., 92 N. J. Law, 550, 106 A. 379; Alberta Contracting Corp. v. Santomassimo, 107 N. J. Law, 7, 150 A. 830. 5 1 Stat. 76, 77, Jud. Code §§ 24(3) and 256(3), U. S. C., tit. 28, §§ 41(3), 371 Third, 28 USCA §§ 41(3), 6 ......
-
Brauch v. Skinner Bros. Mfg. Co.
... ... Bros., 109 Conn. 378, 146 A. 825; Saba v. Pioneer ... Contracting Co., 131 A. 394; Smith v. Hamilton, ... 231 Ill.App. 482; J. E. Porter ... v. Industrial ... Comm., 301 Ill. 76, 133 N.E. 652; Alberta ... Contracting Corp. v. Santomassimo (N. J. L.), 150 A ... 830; Orange ... ...
-
THE LINSEED KING
...A. 560, affirmed in 103 N. J. Law, 713, 137 A. 437; Rachels v. Pepoon, 135 A. 684, 5 N. J. Misc. R. 122; Alberta Contracting Corporation v. Santomassimo (N. J. Sup.) 150 A. 830, 831. There are numerous rulings by the New Jersey Workmen's Compensation Bureau to the same effect. Gebhardt v. M......