ALBUQUERQUE BROADCAST. CO. v. Regents of NM College, Civil Action No. 902.
Decision Date | 07 December 1945 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. 902. |
Citation | 70 F. Supp. 198 |
Parties | ALBUQUERQUE BROADCASTING CO. v. REGENTS OF NEW MEXICO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND MECHANIC ARTS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico |
M. C. Mechem and A. T. Hannett, both of Albuquerque, N. M., Carl A. Hatch, of Clovis, N. M., and W. Theodore Pierson, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
C. C. McCulloh, Atty. Gen., and Harry L. Bigbee, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.
Findings of Fact.
1. That plaintiff is the owner and licensee of KOB and defendant is the former owner thereof.
2. That in 1931 when defendant was owner and licensee of KOB it leased the station and its equipment to Journal Publishing Company, under which lease the control of the operation and supervision of most of the programs broadcast by KOB were vested in the unlicensed lessee. The Federal Radio Commission was not at that time notified of the transaction, nor was that Commission's consent to the assignment of the rights under the license obtained as was required by Section 12 of the Radio Act of 1927, 44 Stat. 1167. Subsequently the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., was enacted and the powers of Federal Radio Commission were vested in the Federal Communications Commission. Section 12 of the Radio Act of 1927 was reenacted in all respects here material as Section 310(b) of Communications Act of 1934.
3. That in April, 1935, the lease having been called to the attention of the Federal Communications Commission, the Commission through its secretary directed a letter to counsel for defendant, in which among other things the defendant was advised as follows:
About a month later the defendant filed an application for renewal of its license and the Commission designated the same for hearing on October 1, 1935, to determine, among other things, whether defendant, then the licensee, had violated the Communications Act.
4. That the defendant did not have the finances to operate the station, the lessee having sustained an operating loss of approximately $97,000 the previous four years under the lease.
5. That on May 7, 1936, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract which provided that defendant would sell the physical assets to plaintiff and assign the license of KOB issued to defendant for $25,000 cash, and the use of the station for one hour per day for educational purposes and programs on a non-cumulative basis. The provisions of this time and the provisions for plaintiff's control of this station were provided by the following last two paragraphs of the contract which are the subject matter of the controversy in the instant suit:
The last paragraph was required to be a part of the contract under the Commission Rule 103.18 before the Commission would even consider an application for its consent to the assignment of the license.
6. That the Commission's consent to the assignment of the license was sought and obtained, and the contract, copy of which had been attached to the application, was executed, except, of course, the provision for one hour of time per day and reference to defendant in certain station announcements which of necessity remained executory.
7. On June 30, 1945, defendant made the following written demand on plaintiff:
8. Plaintiff thereupon filed this complaint for declaratory judgment and asked the Court to declare among other things that plaintiff could not legally accede to the demands of June 30, 1945, and further that defendant was without right under the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crispin Company v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.
...2 Cir., 189 F.2d 939, 25 A.L.R.2d 1337, and cases there cited; for similar holding as to other statutes, see Albuquerque Broadcasting Co. v. Regents, etc., D.C., 70 F.Supp. 198, as to Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.; Johnson v. Butler Bros., 162 F.2d 87, 172 A.L.R. 115......
-
Wallace v. World Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
... ... This is an action for the recovery of a fire loss occurring under a ... ...
-
Massachusetts Univ. Conv. v. Hildreth & Rogers Co.
...licensee in selecting programs at any time in proceedings under 47 U.S.C.A. § 312. Albuquerque Broadcasting Co. v. Regents of New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, D.C., 70 F.Supp. 198, 202. The enforcement of the Act and the development of the concept of public interest unde......
-
Massachusetts Univ. Conv. v. Hildreth & Rogers Co., Civ. No. 8472.
...licensee in selecting programs at any time in proceedings under 47 U.S.C.A. § 312. Albuquerque Broadcasting Co. v. Regents of New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, D.C., 70 F.Supp. 198, 202. The enforcement of the Act and the development of the concept of public interest unde......