Aldridge v. Union Bankers Insurance Co., 72-1109. Summary Calendar.
Decision Date | 13 April 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 72-1109. Summary Calendar.,72-1109. Summary Calendar. |
Citation | 457 F.2d 501 |
Parties | Dan A. ALDRIDGE d/b/a Dan A. Aldridge & Associates, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNION BANKERS INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
With leave to the defendant-appellant to move the district court under Fed.R. Civ.P. 60(b) for relief from the interest provision contained in the final judgment entered on October 22, 1971,1 we affirm. See Local Rule 21.2
* Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N. Y. 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).
1 The judgment mirrors the language of the jury verdict allowing interest upon the principal contract amount, rather than on the commission amount which was in suit. Both parties concede that this was due to mistake or inadvertence.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sommer Corporation v. Panama Canal Company
...judgment, whether or not based on F.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Meadows v. Cohen, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 750, 752, n. 4; Aldridge v. Union Bankers Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 457 F.2d 501. See also, McDowell v. Celebreeze, 5 Cir., 1962, 310 F.2d 43, 44. But we disagree with this hypercritical reading ......
-
Lairsey v. Advance Abrasives Co.
...the district court to consider it, or we could affirm subject to the district court's considering the motion. Aldridge v. Union Bankers Insurance Co., 457 F.2d 501 (C.A.5, 1972). In Burnside v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., supra, we perhaps forecast our present conclusion. There plaintiff's comp......
-
Parks v. U.S. Life and Credit Corp., 81-7758
...the district court to consider it, or we could affirm subject to the district court's considering the motion. Aldridge v. Union Bankers Insurance Co., 457 F.2d 501 (C.A.5, 1972). 542 F.2d at Nonetheless, appellant, acknowledging the absence of a pending appeal here, argues that Lairsey stan......
- ESTATE HEDRICK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 26292.