Alexander v. Carsley

Decision Date22 April 1946
Docket Number36099.
Citation25 So.2d 709,199 Miss. 881
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesALEXANDER v. CARSLEY et al.

W B. Nicols and S. C. Mims, both of Grenada, for appellant.

R. P. Sugg, of Eupora, and Cowles Horton, of Grenada, for appellees.

ALEXANDER Justice.

Appellant filed suit for personal injuries inflicted by Carsley, who as a member of the State Highway Patrol and in exercise of his authority and duties as such, committed an assault upon him.The surety on the official bond, the Fidelity &amp Deposit Company of Maryland, was made a joint defendant.

The record shows that if the one year statute of limitations for such action, Code 1942, Section 732, applies the trial judge was correct in sustaining this plea.The suit, however, is against the officer and the surety upon his official bond.

It is true that the declaration is inartificially drawn and although it purports to attach a copy of the bond as an exhibit, this was not done.Yet no objection was made upon the ground that the bond was not exhibited and the point may not be raised for the first time in this Court.Enochs-Flowers, Inc., v. Bank of Forest,172 Miss. 36157 So. 711, 159 So. 407.No point seems to have been made as to the necessity for compliance with Code 1942, Section 4034, and we express no opinion thereon.

We are of the opinion that the action is against a public officer and the surety on his bond and that appellant is entitled to undertake to show that the conduct of the officer constituted a breach of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • City of Mound Bayou v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 18 April 1990
    ...in the leg, causing the leg to be amputated. The Court held the action without the one-year limitations statute. Alexander v. Carsley, 199 Miss. 881, 25 So.2d 709 (1946) is to like Upon reading Smith we are not at all sure it even addresses the question what limitations period governs the s......
  • Mathis v. Indem. Ins. Co. of North America
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi
    • 24 March 1983
    ...on written contracts. 156 Miss. at 289, 125 So. at 826. (citation omitted). This pronouncement was reiterated in Alexander v. Carsley, 199 Miss. 881, 25 So.2d 709 (1946), in which the supreme court again held that a suit on an official bond was subject to the six-year statute, and has been ......
  • Stewart v. Russell, Civ. A. No. E83-0196(L).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi
    • 5 February 1986
    ...law enforcement officers under state law, State For Use of Smith v. Smith, 156 Miss. 288, 125 So. 825 (1930), and Alexander v. Carsley, 199 Miss. 881, 25 So.2d 709 (1946), the court in Shaw stated that, when an act of a law enforcement officer involves excessive force or otherwise deprives ......
  • Shaw v. McCorkle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 30 August 1976
    ...in that it was not brought under § 1983 and was in state rather than federal court, the Mississippi Supreme Court in Alexander v. Carsley, 1946, 199 Miss. 881, 25 So.2d 709, relied on Smith in holding that the action was a suit on the bond and not subject to the one-year statute of limitati......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT