Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co.
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
| Citation | Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co., 249 F. 1 (3rd Cir. 1917) |
| Decision Date | 24 November 1917 |
| Docket Number | 2277-2280. |
| Parties | ALEXANDER et al. v. FIDELITY TRUST CO. (three cases). FIDELITY TRUST CO. v. ALEXANDER et al. |
On Rehearing, March 27, 1918.
On Petition for Reargument. [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
M Hampton Todd, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
H Gordon McCouch and Harold B. Beitler, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, McPHERSON, and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges.
Federal jurisdiction of this action depends upon diversity of citizenship. The bill was brought by Archibald A. Alexander, Mary C. Alexander, and John S. Alexander against the Fidelity Trust Company as executor of their father, John Alexander, to compel an account of a certain trust. The fundamental averments of the bill are that John Alexander had been a trustee for the plaintiffs, that he had not accounted for the fund, but had left it as an indistinguishable part of his estate, and that his executor was in possession of assets sufficient to respond to the plaintiffs' demand. In full detail the facts appear in the following unreported opinion of Judge Thompson, delivered August 26, 1915:
and the land was purchased at the sheriff's sale by John Alexander in his own right for the sum of $6,500 and a deed made to him by the sheriff. The title to the property remained in John Alexander at the time of his death. John Alexander continued to recognize the George Jones trust and his liability to account under it down to the time of his death. This is shown by entries in his book and by declarations in wills made in 1891 and 1893. In a will executed June 26, 1891, by item 4 he directed his executors (in case he did not do the same thing in his lifetime) to transfer to the Fidelity Insurance Trust & Safe Deposit Company, in trust for his daughter Mary, certain securities, and, in case he did not do the same thing in his lifetime, to transfer to his son Archibald certain securities and the proceeds of a certain life insurance policy, with the following clause applying to both bequests: 'Which transfers include payment in full to my daughter Mary C. and my son Archibald A. of their interest in bequest of their Grandfather.'
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Grand Nat. Bank of St. Louis
...to one of two motives, the law prefers to refer it to that which is honest, rather than to that which is dishonest, Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co. (C. C. A. 3) 249 F. 1. As said by this court in American Surety Co. v. Citizens' Natl. Bank (C. C. A. 8) 294 F. 609, 616: "Until there be reaso......
-
Groves v. Aegerter
... ... Rawley, Modern Law of Partnership, pars. 631 and 641. (2) A ... fiduciary who commingles trust funds with his own individual ... funds, and uses the whole in his prvate enterprise toward a ... 22 C. J., p. 220, ... par. 193 and par. 199; Alexander v. Fidelity Trust ... Co., 249 F. 1, 161 C. C. A. 61; Donaghey v ... Williams, 185 S.W. 778, ... ...
-
Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Atwood
...v. McAuley, 149 U. S. 608, 13 S. Ct. 906, 37 L. Ed. 867; Thomas v. Commonwealth Trust Co. (D. C.) 2 F. Supp. 654; Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co. (C. C. A.) 249 F. 1. Indeed, the appellants do not dispute the right of the bank to have its claims against the mortgage trust, which the Orphans......
-
Engelsmann v. Holekamp, 51303
...a trust, see: Akin v. Warner, 318 Mass. 669, 63 N.E.2d 566; Markus v. Markus, 331 Mass. 394, 119 N.E.2d 415, 418; Alexander et al. v. Fidelity Trust Co., 249 F. 1 (CCA--3 Cir.). Price v. Boyle, 287 Mo. 257, 229 S.W. 206, 208, cited by defendant, is a suit by the administrator of the estate ......